Suppr超能文献

美国的助产护理、社会及医学风险因素与分娩结局

Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA.

作者信息

MacDorman M F, Singh G K

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 May;52(5):310-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.310.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if there are significant differences in birth outcomes and survival for infants delivered by certified nurse midwives compared with those delivered by physicians, and whether these differences, if they exist, remain after controlling for sociodemographic and medical risk factors.

DESIGN

Logistic regression models were used to examine differences between certified nurse midwife and physician delivered births in infant, neonatal, and postneonatal mortality, and risk of low birthweight after controlling for a variety of social and medical risk factors. Ordinary least squares regression models were used to examine differences in mean birthweight after controlling for the same risk factors.

STUDY SETTING

United States.

PATIENTS

The study included all singleton, vaginal births at 35-43 weeks gestation delivered either by physicians or certified nurse midwives in the United States in 1991.

MAIN RESULTS

After controlling for social and medical risk factors, the risk of experiencing an infant death was 19% lower for certified nurse midwife attended than for physician attended births, the risk of neonatal mortality was 33% lower, and the risk of delivering a low birthweight infant 31% lower. Mean birthweight was 37 grams heavier for the certified nurse midwife attended than for physician attended births.

CONCLUSIONS

National data support the findings of previous local studies that certified nurse midwives have excellent birth outcomes. These findings are discussed in light of differences between certified nurse midwives and physicians in prenatal care and labour and delivery care practices. Certified nurse midwives provide a safe and viable alternative to maternity care in the United States, particularly for low to moderate risk women.

摘要

研究目的

确定与医生接生的婴儿相比,由认证护士助产士接生的婴儿在出生结局和存活率方面是否存在显著差异,以及在控制社会人口统计学和医疗风险因素后,这些差异(如果存在)是否依然存在。

设计

使用逻辑回归模型来检验在控制各种社会和医疗风险因素后,认证护士助产士接生的婴儿与医生接生的婴儿在婴儿、新生儿和新生儿后期死亡率以及低出生体重风险方面的差异。使用普通最小二乘法回归模型来检验在控制相同风险因素后平均出生体重的差异。

研究地点

美国。

研究对象

该研究纳入了1991年在美国由医生或认证护士助产士接生的所有妊娠35 - 43周的单胎阴道分娩。

主要结果

在控制社会和医疗风险因素后,由认证护士助产士接生的婴儿发生婴儿死亡的风险比由医生接生的婴儿低19%,新生儿死亡率低33%,低出生体重婴儿的出生风险低31%。由认证护士助产士接生的婴儿的平均出生体重比由医生接生的婴儿重37克。

结论

全国性数据支持了先前本地研究的结果,即认证护士助产士有出色的出生结局。根据认证护士助产士与医生在产前护理以及分娩护理实践方面的差异对这些结果进行了讨论。认证护士助产士为美国的孕产妇护理提供了一种安全且可行的替代方案,特别是对于低至中度风险的女性。

相似文献

3
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.美国计划在家分娩的围产期风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):350.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Handedness in twins: meta-analyses.双手习惯的遗传性:荟萃分析。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jan 15;10(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00695-3.
8
9
The midwife as an "Instrument" of care.助产士作为护理的“工具”。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Nov;92(11):1759-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.11.1759.

本文引用的文献

2
Findings of the American College of Nurse-Midwives Annual Membership Surveys, 1993 and 1994.
J Nurse Midwifery. 1996 May-Jun;41(3):230-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(96)00018-3.
4
Too small, too soon.太小,太早。
Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ. 1995 Winter(36):35-7.
5
Premature babes.早产儿
Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ. 1995 Winter(36):33-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验