• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的助产护理、社会及医学风险因素与分娩结局

Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA.

作者信息

MacDorman M F, Singh G K

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 May;52(5):310-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.310.

DOI:10.1136/jech.52.5.310
PMID:9764282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1756707/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if there are significant differences in birth outcomes and survival for infants delivered by certified nurse midwives compared with those delivered by physicians, and whether these differences, if they exist, remain after controlling for sociodemographic and medical risk factors.

DESIGN

Logistic regression models were used to examine differences between certified nurse midwife and physician delivered births in infant, neonatal, and postneonatal mortality, and risk of low birthweight after controlling for a variety of social and medical risk factors. Ordinary least squares regression models were used to examine differences in mean birthweight after controlling for the same risk factors.

STUDY SETTING

United States.

PATIENTS

The study included all singleton, vaginal births at 35-43 weeks gestation delivered either by physicians or certified nurse midwives in the United States in 1991.

MAIN RESULTS

After controlling for social and medical risk factors, the risk of experiencing an infant death was 19% lower for certified nurse midwife attended than for physician attended births, the risk of neonatal mortality was 33% lower, and the risk of delivering a low birthweight infant 31% lower. Mean birthweight was 37 grams heavier for the certified nurse midwife attended than for physician attended births.

CONCLUSIONS

National data support the findings of previous local studies that certified nurse midwives have excellent birth outcomes. These findings are discussed in light of differences between certified nurse midwives and physicians in prenatal care and labour and delivery care practices. Certified nurse midwives provide a safe and viable alternative to maternity care in the United States, particularly for low to moderate risk women.

摘要

研究目的

确定与医生接生的婴儿相比,由认证护士助产士接生的婴儿在出生结局和存活率方面是否存在显著差异,以及在控制社会人口统计学和医疗风险因素后,这些差异(如果存在)是否依然存在。

设计

使用逻辑回归模型来检验在控制各种社会和医疗风险因素后,认证护士助产士接生的婴儿与医生接生的婴儿在婴儿、新生儿和新生儿后期死亡率以及低出生体重风险方面的差异。使用普通最小二乘法回归模型来检验在控制相同风险因素后平均出生体重的差异。

研究地点

美国。

研究对象

该研究纳入了1991年在美国由医生或认证护士助产士接生的所有妊娠35 - 43周的单胎阴道分娩。

主要结果

在控制社会和医疗风险因素后,由认证护士助产士接生的婴儿发生婴儿死亡的风险比由医生接生的婴儿低19%,新生儿死亡率低33%,低出生体重婴儿的出生风险低31%。由认证护士助产士接生的婴儿的平均出生体重比由医生接生的婴儿重37克。

结论

全国性数据支持了先前本地研究的结果,即认证护士助产士有出色的出生结局。根据认证护士助产士与医生在产前护理以及分娩护理实践方面的差异对这些结果进行了讨论。认证护士助产士为美国的孕产妇护理提供了一种安全且可行的替代方案,特别是对于低至中度风险的女性。

相似文献

1
Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA.美国的助产护理、社会及医学风险因素与分娩结局
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 May;52(5):310-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.310.
2
Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant.美国的新生儿死亡率与出生地点(医院与家庭)有关,而与分娩助手的类型无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):254.e1-254.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.045. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
3
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.美国计划在家分娩的围产期风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):350.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
4
Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants.美国计划在家分娩的新生儿死亡率与接生人员专业认证的关系。
PLoS One. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0155721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155721. eCollection 2016.
5
Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.独立助产士在分娩中心和家中分娩的结局:日本的一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
6
Labor and birth care by nurse with midwifery skills in Brazil.巴西具备助产技能的护士提供的分娩及产褥期护理。
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):123. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0236-7.
7
Licensed midwife-attended, out-of-hospital births in Washington state: are they safe?华盛顿州由持证助产士接生的院外分娩:它们安全吗?
Birth. 1994 Sep;21(3):141-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1994.tb00513.x.
8
Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting.出生时 Apgar 评分为 0 分,且与分娩环境相关的新生儿癫痫发作或严重神经功能障碍。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):323.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
9
Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009.2006 - 2009年美国新生儿早期及总体死亡率与出生环境的关系
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;211(4):390.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.047. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
10
Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.由认证专业助产士进行的计划在家分娩的结局:北美大型前瞻性研究
BMJ. 2005 Jun 18;330(7505):1416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1416.

引用本文的文献

1
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Articles on Midwifery Based on the Web of Science.基于科学网的助产术研究论文计量分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Mar 11;16:677-692. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S398218. eCollection 2023.
2
Handedness in twins: meta-analyses.双手习惯的遗传性:荟萃分析。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jan 15;10(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00695-3.
3
Using the Ecological Systems Theory to Understand Black/White Disparities in Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in the United States.运用生态系统理论理解美国孕产妇发病率和死亡率的黑/白种差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Jun;8(3):661-669. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00825-4. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
4
Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.产妇在加利福尼亚倾听母亲调查中与助产士和产科医生的分娩护理和体验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):45-55. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13027. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
5
The experience of perinatal care at a birthing center: a qualitative pilot study.分娩中心围产期护理体验:一项定性试点研究。
J Perinat Educ. 2008 Summer;17(3):42-50. doi: 10.1624/105812408X329593.
6
A hospital-based doula program and childbirth outcomes in an urban, multicultural setting.在城市多元文化环境中开展的一项基于医院的导乐服务项目及分娩结局。
Matern Child Health J. 2008 May;12(3):372-7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0245-9. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
7
Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison.出生证明与医院出院数据的准确性:认证护士助产士与医生的比较
Matern Child Health J. 2007 Nov;11(6):540-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0178-3. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
8
Advancing normal birth: organizations, goals, and research.推动正常分娩:组织、目标与研究
J Perinat Educ. 2005 Spring;14(2):40-8. doi: 10.1624/105812405X44727.
9
The midwife as an "Instrument" of care.助产士作为护理的“工具”。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Nov;92(11):1759-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.11.1759.
10
The practice of nurse-midwifery in the era of managed care: reports from the field.管理式医疗时代的助产护理实践:来自实地的报告。
Matern Child Health J. 2002 Jun;6(2):127-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1015420425487.

本文引用的文献

1
Production process substitution in maternity care: issues of cost, quality, and outcomes by nurse-midwives and physician providers.产科护理中的生产过程替代:护士助产士和医生提供者的成本、质量及结果问题
Med Care Rev. 1993 Spring;50(1):81-112. doi: 10.1177/002570879305000106.
2
Findings of the American College of Nurse-Midwives Annual Membership Surveys, 1993 and 1994.
J Nurse Midwifery. 1996 May-Jun;41(3):230-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(96)00018-3.
3
Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care.助产士主导护理效果的随机对照试验
Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):213-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)11207-3.
4
Too small, too soon.太小,太早。
Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ. 1995 Winter(36):35-7.
5
Premature babes.早产儿
Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ. 1995 Winter(36):33-4.
6
Where babies are born and who attends their births: findings from the revised 1989 United States Standard Certificate of Live Birth.婴儿的出生地点及接生人员:基于1989年修订版美国出生证明标准的研究结果
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;81(6):997-1004.
7
Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records.利用孕产妇和新生儿医院记录对1989年田纳西州出生证明进行验证。
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Apr 1;137(7):758-68. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116736.
8
Philosophy of care. A pilot study comparing certified nurse-midwives and physicians.护理理念。一项比较认证助产士和医生的试点研究。
J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 May-Jun;38(3):159-64. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(93)90040-n.
9
The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.新出生证明数据的质量:北卡罗来纳州的一项验证研究。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug;83(8):1163-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1163.
10
Maternal and infant care: comparisons between Western Europe and the United States.母婴护理:西欧与美国之间的比较。
Int J Health Serv. 1993;23(4):655-64. doi: 10.2190/RR4G-NTB1-L229-FVHG.