Pearle M S, Moon Y T, Endicott R C, Gardner S M, Humphrey P, Clayman R V
Department of Surgery, Midwest Stone Institute, St. Louis, Missouri.
J Urol. 1994 Dec;152(6 Pt 2):2232-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)31649-x.
Excellent results and durable success have been achieved with antegrade and retrograde endo-pyelotomy for treating primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Recently, a 30F dilating balloon was used to rupture the ureteropelvic junction (ENDOBRST) with encouraging results. While balloon distention of the ureteropelvic junction is a technically simpler procedure than endo-pyelotomy, clinical and laboratory data comparing the 2 methods are lacking. In an acute and chronic animal study we compared endo-pyelotomy via a ureteral cutting balloon incision to balloon rupture (that is 30F) of the normal ureteropelvic junction in each of 20 female farm pigs. Eight pigs were harvested acutely after treatment, and a macroscopic and histological examination of the treated ureteropelvic junction was completed. In 11 chronic pigs after endo-pyelotomy a 7F double pigtail ureteral stent was placed bilaterally and then removed after 6 weeks. Evaluation in the chronic group consisted of a furosemide washout renogram and retrograde pyelogram immediately preoperatively and 6 weeks after stent removal. The animals were likewise harvested 6 weeks after stent removal. One control pig underwent passage of the balloon cutting catheter and balloon dilating catheters without activation or dilation, respectively. Ureteral stents were placed bilaterally for 6 weeks and the pig was otherwise treated similarly to the other chronic study animals. In the acute group all ureters after endo-pyelotomy demonstrated retroperitoneal extravasation of contrast material. At harvest the ureters had been cleanly incised along a length of 3 to 4 cm. through the adventitial layer. In contrast, the balloon treated ureters showed free retroperitoneal extravasation in only half of the animals. Among the balloon treated ureters 7 of 8 had a linear tear of varying length (1 to 5 cm.) involving all but a thin adventitial layer of tissue. Histologically, the endo-pyelotomy ureters demonstrated a clean, linear transmural incision with virtually no destruction of surrounding tissue in 6 cases. In the remaining 2 cases an incision into but not completely through the muscular layer was observed. The balloon treated ureters showed a perforation through the muscular wall in 7 cases. However, periureteral hemorrhage and urothelial loss were common findings. In the chronic group infection and continued urine extravasation from the endo-pyelotomy site resulted in a 45% mortality rate. Of the surviving 6 pigs 83% of the balloon treated and 67% of the endo-pyelotomy pigs had a patent ureteropelvic junction by retrograde pyelogram and renogram. Histologically, the 2 sides were indistinguishable, with both showing mild fibrosis and chronic inflammation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
顺行和逆行肾盂内切开术治疗原发性和继发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻均取得了优异的效果和持久的成功。最近,一种30F扩张球囊被用于破裂输尿管肾盂连接部(ENDOBRST),结果令人鼓舞。虽然输尿管肾盂连接部的球囊扩张术在技术上比肾盂内切开术更简单,但缺乏比较这两种方法的临床和实验室数据。在一项急性和慢性动物研究中,我们将通过输尿管切割球囊切口进行的肾盂内切开术与20头雌性农场猪的正常输尿管肾盂连接部的球囊破裂术(即30F)进行了比较。8头猪在治疗后急性处死,对治疗后的输尿管肾盂连接部进行了宏观和组织学检查。在11头接受肾盂内切开术的慢性猪中,双侧放置了7F双猪尾输尿管支架,6周后取出。慢性组的评估包括术前即刻和支架取出后6周的速尿洗脱肾图和逆行肾盂造影。支架取出后6周同样处死动物。1头对照猪分别通过球囊切割导管和球囊扩张导管,但未激活或扩张。双侧放置输尿管支架6周,该猪的其他治疗与其他慢性研究动物相似。在急性组中,肾盂内切开术后所有输尿管均显示造影剂腹膜后外渗。处死时,输尿管沿外膜层被整齐地切开3至4厘米。相比之下,球囊治疗的输尿管仅在一半的动物中显示腹膜后自由外渗。在球囊治疗的输尿管中,8条中有7条有不同长度(1至5厘米)的线性撕裂,除了一层薄薄的外膜组织外,所有组织层均受累。组织学上,肾盂内切开术的输尿管在6例中显示为干净的线性透壁切口,周围组织几乎没有破坏。在其余2例中,观察到切口进入但未完全穿过肌肉层。球囊治疗的输尿管在7例中显示穿过肌壁的穿孔。然而,输尿管周围出血和尿路上皮丢失是常见的发现。在慢性组中,肾盂内切开术部位的感染和持续尿液外渗导致死亡率为45%。在存活的6头猪中,通过逆行肾盂造影和肾图检查,球囊治疗的猪中有83%、肾盂内切开术的猪中有67%的输尿管肾盂连接部通畅。组织学上,两侧无明显差异,均显示轻度纤维化和慢性炎症。(摘要截断于400字)