Suppr超能文献

保留大隐静脉的静脉曲张手术:高位结扎剥脱术与股隐静脉瓣膜成形术-剥脱术的比较

Varicose vein surgery with preservation of the saphenous vein: a comparison between high ligation-avulsion versus saphenofemoral banding valvuloplasty-avulsion.

作者信息

Schanzer H, Skladany M

机构信息

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1994 Nov;20(5):684-7. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70154-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of varicose veins with preservation of the greater saphenous vein (GSV) was studied.

METHODS

Patients with reflux at the saphenofemoral junction and grossly normal GSV were treated with two different surgical techniques: perivalvular banding valvuloplasty (PVBV-A) of the saphenous valve, wherein the diameter of the uppermost saphenous valve was narrowed by Dacron-reinforced silicone band (12 patients, 15 extremities); and high ligation (HL-A) of the saphenous vein, wherein the GSV was ligated flush with the femoral vein (14 patients, 16 extremities). Both groups also had varicose tributaries of GSV avulsed through multiple stab incisions.

RESULTS

In the HL-A group two GSV (13%) remained completely patent, 10 GSV (62.5%) thrombosed partially, and the remaining four GSV (25%) had complete thrombosis. In the PVBV-A group 12 GSV (80%) remained completely patent and without reflux, one GSV (7%) remained patent but showing reflux. Two GSV (13%) thrombosed completely. There were no surgical complications or recurrences (mean follow-up was 9.4 months for PVBV-A and 9.5 months for HL-A), and the postoperative recovery time was similar for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques are equally effective in the early elimination of varicosities. Preservation of the saphenous vein is significantly better after PVBV-A (p < 0.01). A prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up is required.

摘要

目的

研究保留大隐静脉(GSV)的静脉曲张手术治疗方法。

方法

对大隐股静脉交界处存在反流且大隐静脉大体正常的患者采用两种不同的手术技术进行治疗:大隐静脉瓣膜周带瓣膜成形术(PVBV-A),即用涤纶加强硅胶带使最上方大隐静脉瓣膜直径变窄(12例患者,15条肢体);大隐静脉高位结扎术(HL-A),即将大隐静脉与股静脉齐平结扎(14例患者,16条肢体)。两组均通过多个小切口剥脱大隐静脉的曲张属支。

结果

在HL-A组中,2条大隐静脉(13%)完全通畅,10条大隐静脉(62.5%)部分血栓形成,其余4条大隐静脉(25%)完全血栓形成。在PVBV-A组中,12条大隐静脉(80%)完全通畅且无反流,1条大隐静脉(7%)通畅但有反流。2条大隐静脉(13%)完全血栓形成。无手术并发症或复发(PVBV-A组平均随访9.4个月,HL-A组平均随访9.5个月),两组术后恢复时间相似。

结论

两种技术在早期消除静脉曲张方面同样有效。PVBV-A术后大隐静脉的保留情况明显更好(P<0.01)。需要进行一项长期随访的前瞻性随机试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验