Elks M A
Association for Community Living in Colorado, Denver 80222.
Ment Retard. 1994 Aug;32(4):265-71.
The view was presented that social role valorization is not an adequate reformulation and replacement for the principle of normalization due to (a) inconsistencies in application of a distinction between valuing the person and valuing the person's social role, (b) the fact that valued social roles do not automatically lead to culturally valued lives and identities, (c) social role valorization not being substantially less "trans-empirical" than normalization, and (d) the inadequacy of valued social roles in providing defense against the dynamics of social devaluation. The term social valorization, in which the person and role are valued, is offered as a possibly more coherent replacement for the term normalization.
有人认为，社会角色增值并非对正常化原则的适当重新表述和替代，原因如下：(a) 在重视个人与重视个人社会角色之间的区分应用上存在不一致；(b) 被重视的社会角色不会自动带来具有文化价值的生活和身份；(c) 社会角色增值在“超经验”方面并不比正常化少很多；(d) 被重视的社会角色在抵御社会贬值动态方面存在不足。“社会增值”这一术语，即重视个人和角色，被提议作为“正常化”这一术语可能更连贯的替代词。
