Muşeţeanu C, Henneberg G
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1976 Nov;236(2-3):205-14.
The archives of the Robert Koch Institute include a casket with preparations and handwritten notes by Robert Koch (Fig. 1). He made these preparations during his time as a rural doctor between October of 1878 and September of 1880. They refer to an outbreak of sheep-pox at Rackwitz, a place near his practice at Wollstein (Fig. 2). This work has not been published; we know of it from one of Robert Koch's private letters (11). To reconstruct his working scheme and reasoning, we consulted particularly his reports on rinderpest experiments which he began in 1896 (6). The preparations from this casket which had been stained with Bismarck brown (according to Weigert) date back to a period when Robert Koch developed the foundations of bacteriology and they are evidence of his preparedness to accept new operational procedures (1, 2, 3). Thus, we have to assume that these preparations were to serve as evidence of a bacteriological etiology of sheep-pox. A wrong conclusion as to associations between the superinfection present and etiology of the disease (7) was ruled out by maintaining his own postulate. Simultaneously with this preparation work, Robert Koch performed animal experiments (11). His experience from these studies was utilized later on in his rinderpest experiments (6). On account of his confrontation with viral disease - which had its starting point in his unpublished work on sheep-pox - Robert Koch stated his postulate to be valid in the same manner as if bacteriological etiology had been demonstrated (4,6). The importance of these preparations is also seen in the interpretation of viral tissue damage, i.e. increase of macrophages and plasma cells with subsequent necrosis (9) characteristic of vira infection (Figs. 3, 4).
罗伯特·科赫研究所的档案中存有一个匣子,里面装有罗伯特·科赫制作的标本和手写笔记(图1)。这些标本是他在1878年10月至1880年9月担任乡村医生期间制作的。它们与当时在拉克维茨发生的羊痘疫情有关,拉克维茨是他在沃尔施泰因诊所附近的一个地方(图2)。这项工作尚未发表;我们是从罗伯特·科赫的一封私人信件中得知此事的(11)。为了重构他的工作方案和推理过程,我们特别查阅了他1896年开始的牛瘟实验报告(6)。这个匣子中的标本用俾斯麦棕染色(据魏格特所述),其年代可追溯到罗伯特·科赫奠定细菌学基础的时期,它们证明了他愿意接受新的操作程序(1、2、3)。因此,我们不得不假定这些标本是为了证明羊痘的细菌学病因。通过坚持自己的假设,排除了关于现有二重感染与疾病病因之间关联的错误结论(7)。在进行这项标本制作工作的同时,罗伯特·科赫还进行了动物实验(11)。他从这些研究中获得的经验后来被用于他的牛瘟实验(6)。由于他对病毒性疾病的研究——其起点是他未发表的关于羊痘的工作——罗伯特·科赫宣称他的假设同样有效,就好像已经证明了细菌学病因一样(4、6)。这些标本的重要性还体现在对病毒组织损伤的解读中,即巨噬细胞和浆细胞增多并随后出现坏死(9),这是病毒感染的特征(图3、4)。