Suppr超能文献

系统发育模式与生物多样性的量化

Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity.

作者信息

Faith D P

机构信息

Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin (Institute for Advanced Study Berlin), Germany.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jul 29;345(1311):45-58. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0085.

Abstract

Biodiversity can be explored at a number of different levels and in principle may be separately quantified at each. Phylogenetic pattern has the potential to quantify and estimate biodiversity at the finest scale, that is, variation among species in features or attributes. This scale is an important one for conservation, as it should form the basis for prioritizing conservation efforts at the species level. Further, recent published objections to differentially weighting species are answered by defining option value at this feature-level. Unfortunately, there has been no consensus on exactly how phylogeny can be used to value species, possibly because proper consideration of the link between pattern and underlying features generally has been unresolved. 'Phylogenetic diversity' (PD) represents just one of several approaches that do consider diversity at the feature-level explicitly. These alternative approaches are discussed in the context of a general framework for using pattern to quantify diversity at a level below that of the original objects. The pattern framework highlights that estimation of biodiversity at a lower level using pattern will require decisions about the nature of the units of diversity, the kind of pattern to be used, the model relating unit items to pattern, and finally how this implies a pattern-based measure reflecting biodiversity. An alternative published model for relating features to a particular form of phylogenetic pattern is considered, and shown to make unwarranted assumptions. A possible alternative definition of the underlying units of diversity is examined, which may represent a different form of option value, also quantifiable using phylogeny. A possible alternative pattern to a phylogenetic tree for the prediction of feature diversity is also discussed. The appeal of these alternative approaches depends on the goals of conservation; in addition, justification for prioritizing or weighting requires that any practical approach avoid arbitrary, unwarranted, assumptions.

摘要

生物多样性可以在多个不同层面进行探究,原则上每个层面都可以单独进行量化。系统发育模式有潜力在最精细的尺度上量化和估算生物多样性,即物种在特征或属性方面的差异。这个尺度对于保护工作至关重要,因为它应该成为在物种层面确定保护工作优先级的基础。此外,最近针对对物种进行差异化加权的反对意见,通过在这个特征层面定义期权价值得到了回应。不幸的是,对于究竟如何利用系统发育来评估物种,尚未达成共识,这可能是因为对模式与潜在特征之间联系的恰当考量通常尚未得到解决。“系统发育多样性”(PD)只是明确考虑特征层面多样性的几种方法之一。这些替代方法将在一个通用框架的背景下进行讨论,该框架用于利用模式在低于原始对象的层面上量化多样性。模式框架强调,使用模式在较低层面估算生物多样性将需要就多样性单位的性质、要使用的模式类型、将单位项目与模式相关联的模型,以及最终这如何意味着一种基于模式的反映生物多样性的度量做出决策。我们考虑了一种已发表的将特征与特定形式的系统发育模式相关联的替代模型,并表明它做出了不合理的假设。我们研究了多样性潜在单位的一种可能的替代定义,它可能代表一种不同形式的期权价值,也可以使用系统发育进行量化。我们还讨论了一种可能替代系统发育树用于预测特征多样性的模式。这些替代方法的吸引力取决于保护目标;此外,对优先级或加权进行论证要求任何实际方法避免任意、不合理的假设。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验