Cook H A, Morales M, La Rosa E M, Dean J, Donnelly M K, McHugh P, Otradovec A, Wright K S, Kula T, Tepper S H
University of Maryland at Baltimore.
Phys Ther. 1994 Nov;74(11):1040-6. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.11.1040.
The mechanism by which electrical stimulation affects edema has not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine whether subcontraction high-voltage stimulation (SC-HVS) (ie, electrical stimulation that did not elicit a visible contraction) applied to the right hind limbs of rats would (1) alter the rate of lymphatic uptake of injected albumin labeled with Evans blue dye (AL-EBD) and (2) affect experimentally induced edema.
The paws of 28 anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats (mean weight = 263 g, SD = 48 g) were injected with AL-EBD. The experimental group (n = 13) received 1 hour of SC-HVS, and the control group (n = 15) received sham treatment consisting of the same treatment administered to the experimental group but without the SC-HVS. Blood samples and volume measurements were obtained at intervals over a 7-hour period.
Analysis of variance and post hoc testing indicated that higher amounts of AL-EBD were taken up by the lymph of the experimental group animals as compared with the control group animals at each time period following the treatment. The experimental group's AL-EBD reached significance immediately after treatment, whereas the control group required an additional 4 hours. There was no significant reduction in limb volume in either group.
The SC-HVS significantly increased the uptake of AL-EBD by lymphatic vessels, but it did not cause a significant decrease in the induced edema. The results of this study indicate that SC-HVS has the potential to reduce edema by increasing lymphatic uptake of proteins.
电刺激影响水肿的机制尚未阐明。本研究的目的是确定对大鼠右后肢施加亚收缩高压刺激(SC-HVS)(即未引起可见收缩的电刺激)是否会(1)改变注射用伊文思蓝染料标记的白蛋白(AL-EBD)的淋巴摄取率,以及(2)影响实验性诱导的水肿。
给28只麻醉的Sprague-Dawley大鼠(平均体重 = 263 g,标准差 = 48 g)的爪子注射AL-EBD。实验组(n = 13)接受1小时的SC-HVS,对照组(n = 15)接受假处理,即给予与实验组相同的处理,但不进行SC-HVS。在7小时内定期采集血样并测量体积。
方差分析和事后检验表明,与对照组动物相比,实验组动物在处理后的每个时间段内,淋巴摄取的AL-EBD量更多。实验组的AL-EBD在处理后立即达到显著水平,而对照组则需要额外4小时。两组的肢体体积均无显著减小。
SC-HVS显著增加了淋巴管对AL-EBD的摄取,但并未使诱导的水肿显著减轻。本研究结果表明,SC-HVS有可能通过增加蛋白质的淋巴摄取来减轻水肿。