Harris M R, McGonigle B O
University of Edinburgh, U.K.
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1994 Aug;47(3):319-48.
We report a formal model of transitive inference based on protocols from experiments on squirrel monkeys solving the 5-term series problem (McGonigle & Chalmers, 1977, 1992). These studies generate databases featuring transitive choice, task transfer (where at first a significant decrement is observed, and later substantial improvement without explicit training), and, finally, a Symbolic Distance Effect (SDE) based on decision-time data. Using a rule-based (production) system, we first established rule stacks at the group, then at the individual level, on the basis of triadic transfer performance first recorded in the McGonigle and Chalmers (1977) study. The models for each subject then accommodated data from the more intensive, later study with the same subjects (McGonigle & Chalmers, 1992). We found the initial model capable of dealing with all choice and reaction-time phenomena reported thus far, with only small changes in a rule search procedure. In common with an independent assay by McGonigle and Chalmers (1992), our model-based reassessment of decision times indicates that a major source of reaction time variation is item prominence in the rule stack rather than interitem (ordinal) distance per se.
我们报告了一种传递性推理的形式模型,该模型基于松鼠猴解决5项系列问题的实验协议(麦戈尼格尔和查尔默斯,1977年,1992年)。这些研究生成了具有传递性选择、任务转移(起初观察到显著下降,后来在没有明确训练的情况下有显著改善)以及最终基于决策时间数据的符号距离效应(SDE)的数据库。我们首先使用基于规则(产生式)系统,在麦戈尼格尔和查尔默斯(1977年)研究中首次记录的三元转移表现的基础上,在群体层面然后在个体层面建立规则堆栈。然后,每个受试者的模型纳入了来自对同一受试者进行的更深入的后续研究(麦戈尼格尔和查尔默斯,1992年)的数据。我们发现初始模型能够处理迄今为止报道的所有选择和反应时间现象,只需在规则搜索程序上做一些小的改变。与麦戈尼格尔和查尔默斯(1992年)的独立分析一样,我们基于模型对决策时间的重新评估表明,反应时间变化的一个主要来源是规则堆栈中项目的突出程度,而不是项目间(序数)距离本身。