Krasheninnikoff M, Ellitsgaard N, Rogvi-Hansen B, Zeuthen A, Harder K, Larsen R, Gaardbo H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Herlev, Denmark.
Scand J Rheumatol. 1994;23(5):260-3. doi: 10.3109/03009749409103726.
Thirty-six patients with lateral epicondylitis of the elbow (19 women, 17 men, median age 48 yrs) were treated either with active laser or placebo, 18 patients in each group. The active laser was a GA-AL-AS 30 mW/830 nm low power laser (LPL). The study design was double blind and randomized. The treatment session consisted of eight treatments, two per week. Patients were irradiated on tender points on the lateral epicondyle and in the forearm extensors. Output power was 3,6 J/point. A follow up was performed by telephone, 10 weeks after the last treatment. No difference between laser and placebo was found on lateral elbow pain (Mann Whitney test, 95% confidence limits). We conclude that low power laser offers no advantage over placebo in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain as lateral epicondylitis. Further studies with low power laser treatment of musculoskeletal pain seem useless.
36例患有外侧肘上髁炎的患者(19名女性,17名男性,中位年龄48岁),分别接受活性激光或安慰剂治疗,每组18例。活性激光为GA - AL - AS 30 mW/830 nm低功率激光(LPL)。研究设计为双盲随机。治疗疗程包括8次治疗,每周2次。对患者的外侧上髁和前臂伸肌的压痛点进行照射。输出功率为3.6 J/点。在最后一次治疗10周后通过电话进行随访。在外侧肘部疼痛方面,激光治疗与安慰剂治疗之间未发现差异(曼-惠特尼检验,95%置信区间)。我们得出结论,在治疗如外侧肘上髁炎这类肌肉骨骼疼痛时,低功率激光并不比安慰剂更具优势。进一步开展低功率激光治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的研究似乎并无意义。