Vassend O, Watten R, Myhrer T, Syvertsen J L
Institute of Community Dentistry, University of Oslo, Norway.
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Aug;39(4):583-90. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90101-5.
In this study we examined the relationship between cognitive ability and Negative Affectivity (NA) (measured as cognitive and behavioral aspects of anxiety) on the one hand, and somatic complaints, symptom attribution (i.e. subjective evaluation of psychological vs somatic symptom causes), perceived daily stress/mood, and disciplinary problems on the other hand, in a sample of military recruits. As expected, cognitive and behavioral anxiety correlated with measures of somatic complaints and with perceived stress/negative mood in the daily service, as well as with symptom attribution. General ability correlated negatively with three of the five somatic complaint scales as well as with presence of disciplinary problems after controlling for NA. However, the effect of the ability factor on these dependent variables was very weak and difficult to interpret. On the whole, cognitive ability does not seem to be an interesting variable in research on the NA-somatic complaints relationship, at least as conceptualized on the trait level. Thus, cognitive ability appears to be of less importance as an explanatory factor in theories of symptom perception and symptom attribution.
在本研究中,我们考察了军事新兵样本中认知能力与消极情感(NA)(以焦虑的认知和行为方面来衡量)之间的关系,以及与躯体主诉、症状归因(即对心理与躯体症状原因的主观评估)、感知到的日常压力/情绪和纪律问题之间的关系。正如预期的那样,认知和行为焦虑与躯体主诉指标、日常服役中感知到的压力/消极情绪以及症状归因相关。在控制了NA之后,一般能力与五个躯体主诉量表中的三个以及纪律问题的存在呈负相关。然而,能力因素对这些因变量的影响非常微弱且难以解释。总体而言,至少在特质水平上概念化时,认知能力在NA与躯体主诉关系的研究中似乎不是一个有趣的变量。因此,在症状感知和症状归因理论中,认知能力作为一个解释因素似乎不太重要。