Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice (CRIISP), Veterans Affairs Iowa City Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jan;100(1):182-95. doi: 10.1037/a0021715.
According to the classic symptom perception hypothesis (Costa & McCrae, 1987; Watson & Pennebaker, 1989), the global predisposition to frequently experience a variety of negative emotions-that is, neuroticism (N) or trait negative affectivity (NA)-is associated with inflated physical symptom reporting. We tested a revision of this hypothesis, which posits distinctive roles for depression and anxiety in the physical symptom experience. Three studies tested predictions from the revised symptom perception hypothesis: (a) that depressive affect should be related to inflated retrospective physical symptom reports and (b) that anxious affect should be related to inflated concurrent, or momentary, physical symptom reports. Study 1 assessed the relations among N/NA, depressive affect, and recall of physical symptoms experienced in the previous 3 weeks. Depressive affect was uniquely and positively associated with recalling more symptoms. When entered with depressive affect in multiple regression analyses, neuroticism was not associated with level of symptoms recalled. In Study 2, participants were randomly assigned to anxious, depressed, angry, happy, or neutral mood inductions and then reported about concurrent symptom experience. Participants in the anxious mood condition reported significantly more concurrent physical symptoms than did those in the other 4 conditions. In Study 3, anxious, depressed, or neutral mood was induced, followed by assessment of both concurrent and retrospective physical symptoms. Those assigned to the anxious mood induction reported more concurrent symptoms, while those in the depressed mood condition reported having experienced more symptoms in the past. These findings are consistent with the idea that encoding and retrieval processes, which are differentially associated with anxious versus depressed affect, influence different aspects of physical symptom reporting. The results have implications for self-diagnosis, medical treatment-seeking, and care, and potential insights about other complex social and interpersonal behaviors are discussed.
根据经典的症状感知假说(Costa & McCrae, 1987; Watson & Pennebaker, 1989),即便是经常经历各种消极情绪的普遍倾向,即神经质(N)或特质负性情绪(NA),也与夸大的身体症状报告有关。我们测试了对该假说的修订版本,该版本认为抑郁和焦虑在身体症状体验中扮演着不同的角色。三项研究检验了修订后的症状感知假说的预测:(a)抑郁情绪应与夸大的回溯性身体症状报告有关,(b)焦虑情绪应与夸大的同时性或瞬时性身体症状报告有关。研究 1 评估了 N/NA、抑郁情绪和对过去 3 周内经历的身体症状的回忆之间的关系。抑郁情绪与回忆更多症状之间存在独特且积极的关联。当将抑郁情绪纳入多元回归分析时,神经质与回忆的症状水平没有关联。在研究 2 中,参与者被随机分配到焦虑、抑郁、愤怒、快乐或中性情绪诱导中,然后报告同时发生的症状体验。处于焦虑情绪状态的参与者报告的同时性身体症状明显多于其他 4 种状态的参与者。在研究 3 中,诱导产生焦虑、抑郁或中性情绪,然后评估同时性和回溯性身体症状。被分配到焦虑情绪诱导组的参与者报告了更多的同时性症状,而处于抑郁情绪状态的参与者则报告过去经历了更多的症状。这些发现与这样一种观点一致,即与焦虑和抑郁情绪相关的编码和检索过程会影响身体症状报告的不同方面。研究结果对自我诊断、求医行为和护理具有重要意义,同时也讨论了其他复杂的社会和人际行为的潜在见解。