Jerosch J, Bischof M
Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemeine Orthopädie, Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1994 Sep;8(3):111-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993462.
Both ankle joints of 14 uninjured volunteers and 16 patients with unstable ankle joints were tested regarding their proprioceptive capabilities. Three tests were used for the study: single-leg stance test, single-leg jumping course test, angle-reproduction test. The influence of three stabilization devices (lace-on-brace, stirrup-brace, taping) on the proprioceptivity of stable and unstable ankle joints were evaluated as well. The scores of the single-leg jumping course test without any stabilizing device (category "standard") ranged between 8.06 and 13.68 (10.65 +/- 1.29). In the categories "mikros" (9.85 +/- 0.99), "aircast" (9.99 +/- 1.14) and with the tape bandage (category "taping") (10.27 +/- 0.81) the scores were lower. In general, the scores of all trials with orthoses were lower compared to the category "standard". The differences of the categories "standard-mikros" and "standard-aircast" revealed a significant reduction of the scores when applicating these orthoses (p < 0.01). The differences of the category "standard-taping" as well as the single scores between the categories "mikros" and "aircast" were not statistically significant. According to the results of the single-leg stance test the error rate was within the range of 0-16 (5.12 +/- 2.85) for the category "standard", it was lower for the categories "mikros" (3.65 +/- 2.65) and "aircast" (4.17 +/- 2.59). The error rate was highest in the group with applicated tape bandage (5.79 +/- 3.53). The differences between the categories "standard"-"mikros" as well as "standard"-"aircast" were statistically significant (p < 0.01). There was also a significant difference between these categories regarding injured and uninjured ankle joints (p < 0.01). The pair differences of the categories "standard" and "taping" were below the significance level as well as the error rates of the categories "mikros" and "aircast". The ankle-reproduction-test showed higher values for the category "standard" (2.36 degrees +/- 0.97) in comparison to the categories "mikros" (1.46 degrees +/- 0.72). "aircast" (1.62 degrees +/- 0.91) and "taping" (1.84 degrees +/- 0.41). In the category "standard" the reproduction error of the uninjured ankle joints was lower (2.30 degrees +/- 1.04) compared to the group of unstable ankle joints (2.44 degrees +/- 0.81), whereas in all other categories the reproduction error was higher in the group of uninjured joints. The differences in all findings between the categories "standard"-"mikros" and "standard"-"aircast" were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The results of the three tests showed a statistically highly significant difference between injured and uninjured ankle joints (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
对14名未受伤志愿者和16名踝关节不稳定患者的双侧踝关节进行本体感觉能力测试。该研究采用了三项测试:单腿站立测试、单腿跳跃测试、角度再现测试。同时评估了三种稳定装置(系带式支具、马镫式支具、绷带)对稳定和不稳定踝关节本体感觉的影响。在无任何稳定装置(“标准”类别)的单腿跳跃测试中,得分在8.06至13.68之间(10.65±1.29)。在“mikros”(9.85±0.99)、“aircast”(9.99±1.14)类别以及使用绷带包扎(“绷带”类别)(10.27±0.81)时,得分较低。总体而言,与“标准”类别相比,所有使用矫形器试验的得分都较低。“标准 - mikros”和“标准 - aircast”类别的差异表明,使用这些矫形器时得分显著降低(p<0.01)。“标准 - 绷带”类别的差异以及“mikros”和“aircast”类别之间的单个得分差异无统计学意义。根据单腿站立测试结果,“标准”类别的错误率在0至16之间(5.12±2.85),“mikros”(3.65±2.65)和“aircast”(4.17±2.59)类别较低。使用绷带包扎组的错误率最高(5.79±3.53)。“标准” - “mikros”以及“标准” - “aircast”类别之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。受伤和未受伤踝关节在这些类别之间也存在显著差异(p<0.01)。“标准”和“绷带”类别的配对差异以及“mikros”和“aircast”类别的错误率均低于显著性水平。与“mikros”(1.46度±0.72)、“aircast”(1.62度±0.91)和“绷带”(1.84度±0.41)类别相比,角度再现测试显示“标准”类别值更高(2.36度±0.97)。在“标准”类别中,未受伤踝关节的再现误差(2.30度±1.04)低于不稳定踝关节组(2.44度±0.81),而在所有其他类别中,未受伤关节组的再现误差更高。“标准” - “mikros”和“标准” - “aircast”类别之间所有结果的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。三项测试结果显示,受伤和未受伤踝关节之间存在统计学上的高度显著差异(p<0.01)。(摘要截选至400字)