Botelho A R, Planta R J
Laboratory of Microbiology, Gulbenkian Institute of Science, Oeiras, Portugal.
Yeast. 1994 Jun;10(6):709-17. doi: 10.1002/yea.320100603.
In order to develop DNA probes for rapid, sensitive and specific detection of the pathogenic yeast species Candida albicans, we carried out comparative sequence analysis of the two internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS1 and ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) units of C. albicans and the closely related pathogenic species C. tropicalis. While overall sequence similarity between the two species was considerable (65-75%), both ITS1 and ITS2 were found to contain distinct regions with sufficient sequence divergence to make them suitable as specific target sites for the identification of C. albicans. On the basis of these results one ITS1-derived (ANAB1) and two ITS2-derived (ANAB2 and ANAB3) oligonucleotides were selected, chemically synthesized, and used as hybridization probes. Their specificity and reliability were evaluated in dot-blot hybridization experiments with total genomic DNA from 13 strains of medically important Candida species, six strains of other yeast genera associated with man and animals, and ten strains previously identified as C. albicans by phenotypic criteria. Under well-defined hybridization conditions the three probes hybridized exclusively with DNA derived from strains belonging to the species C. albicans, thus demonstrating their potential clinical usefulness. The failure of four of the (presumed) C. albicans strains to show hybridization to the ITS probes sheds doubt upon their taxonomic classification, which is reinforced by other phenotypic aspects of these strains.
为了开发用于快速、灵敏且特异性检测致病性酵母白色念珠菌的DNA探针,我们对白色念珠菌及其密切相关的致病菌种热带念珠菌的核糖体DNA(rDNA)单位的两个内部转录间隔区(ITS1和ITS2)进行了比较序列分析。虽然这两个菌种之间的总体序列相似性相当高(65 - 75%),但发现ITS1和ITS2均包含具有足够序列差异的独特区域,使其适合作为鉴定白色念珠菌的特异性靶位点。基于这些结果,选择了一个源自ITS1的(ANAB1)和两个源自ITS2的(ANAB2和ANAB3)寡核苷酸,进行化学合成,并用作杂交探针。在与13株具有医学重要性的念珠菌属菌种、6株与人和动物相关的其他酵母属菌种以及10株先前通过表型标准鉴定为白色念珠菌的菌株的全基因组DNA进行的斑点印迹杂交实验中,评估了它们的特异性和可靠性。在明确的杂交条件下,这三种探针仅与源自白色念珠菌菌株的DNA杂交,从而证明了它们潜在的临床实用性。4株(假定的)白色念珠菌菌株未能与ITS探针显示杂交,这对它们的分类学分类产生了怀疑,这些菌株的其他表型特征也强化了这一点。