• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环形电切术会对宫颈锥切术标本的组织病理学解读产生不利影响吗?

Does the loop electrosurgical excision procedure adversely affect the histopathological interpretation of cervical conization specimens?

作者信息

Chen R J, Lee E F, Shih J C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Oct;73(9):726-9. doi: 10.3109/00016349409029412.

DOI:10.3109/00016349409029412
PMID:7976250
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the suitability of conized specimens obtained by loop electrosurgical excision procedure for histopathological interpretation.

METHODS

We evaluated the histological pictures of 215 tissue sections obtained by loop electrosurgical excision procedure. These sections came from 32 cases of patients with various degrees of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. All women included in our study had a satisfactory colposcopy and no cytological or colposcopic evidence of invasive cancer. We quantified the thickness of thermal damage in the tissue sections using a stage-mounted, calibrated grid microscope.

RESULTS

At its greatest extent, thermal damage occurring next to incision lines ranged from 160 to 520 mu (mean 262, SE 14 mu). Two different zones of thermal damage were produced by LEEP: the carbonization and coagulation zones. The carbonization zone was located at the outermost layer and was very thin, measuring from 10 to 30 mu in depth. The coagulation zone was adjacent to the carbonization zone, was eosinophilic, and was significantly deeper than the carbonization zone at its points of greatest thickness (150 to 500 mu; p < 0.0001, Student's t-test). The depth of the coagulation zone correlated significantly with the depth of the carbonization zone (p = 0.041, least linear correlation). Tissue distortion was present in 53% (17/32) of the cases, and appeared only in the coagulation zone.

CONCLUSION

Tissue structure from the diseased portions of the conized specimens was generally well preserved. The area of thermal damage was limited and thus did not result in diagnostic problems. We conclude that LEEP is a reliable method for obtaining tissue samples for histopathological examination.

摘要

目的

评估经宫颈环形电切术获取的锥切标本用于组织病理学诊断的适宜性。

方法

我们评估了经宫颈环形电切术获取的215个组织切片的组织学图像。这些切片来自32例不同程度宫颈上皮内瘤变的患者。纳入本研究的所有女性均有满意的阴道镜检查结果,且无浸润癌的细胞学或阴道镜证据。我们使用载物台安装的校准网格显微镜对组织切片中的热损伤厚度进行定量分析。

结果

在切口线旁,热损伤最严重时范围为160至520微米(平均262微米,标准误14微米)。宫颈环形电切术产生了两个不同的热损伤区域:碳化区和凝固区。碳化区位于最外层,非常薄,深度为10至30微米。凝固区与碳化区相邻,呈嗜酸性,在其最厚处明显比碳化区深(150至500微米;p < 0.0001,Student t检验)。凝固区的深度与碳化区的深度显著相关(p = 0.041,最小线性相关)。53%(17/32)的病例存在组织变形,且仅出现在凝固区。

结论

锥切标本病变部位的组织结构总体保存良好。热损伤面积有限,因此未导致诊断问题。我们得出结论,宫颈环形电切术是获取用于组织病理学检查的组织样本的可靠方法。

相似文献

1
Does the loop electrosurgical excision procedure adversely affect the histopathological interpretation of cervical conization specimens?环形电切术会对宫颈锥切术标本的组织病理学解读产生不利影响吗?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Oct;73(9):726-9. doi: 10.3109/00016349409029412.
2
Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.宫颈转化区的电外科环形切除术:家庭医生的经验
J Fam Pract. 1995 Oct;41(4):337-44.
3
Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.宫颈切除活检的可解释性:锥形活检和环形切除术。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2009 Jan;13(1):10-2. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31817ff940.
4
Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for conization of the uterine cervix.子宫颈锥切术的环形电外科切除术
J Formos Med Assoc. 1994 Mar;93(3):196-9.
5
Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and Loop Electrosurgical-Excision Procedures (LEEPs) in patients with biopsies proven high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.活检证实为高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变患者的阴道镜引导下宫颈活检与环形电切术(LEEP)之间的病理差异。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;56(5):628-631. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.08.009.
6
Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的评估与阴道镜下活检和环形电切术(LEEP)的疗效。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Dec;286(6):1549-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2493-1. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
7
Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with or without intraoperative colposcopy: a randomized trial.环形电切术(LEEP)加或不加术中阴道镜检查:一项随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):377.e1-377.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
8
'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.“见即治疗”宫颈转化区电外科环切术
J Fam Pract. 1996 Mar;42(3):253-7.
9
Increase in the cervical length after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.宫颈环形电切术治疗III级宫颈上皮内瘤变后宫颈长度增加。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jan;37(1):78-81. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1225024. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
10
Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.大环形切除术与直型电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的随机对照试验:电外科技术的比较。
BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):552-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13200. Epub 2014 Dec 17.