Caretti D M, Pullen P V, Premo L A, Kuhlmann W D
U.S. Army Edgewood Research, Development and Engineering Center, Respiratory Protection Technology Team, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5423.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1994 Oct;55(10):918-23. doi: 10.1080/15428119491018411.
This study was designed to determine the reliability of measurements of respiratory volumes obtained with a respiratory inductive plethysmograph (RIP) during exercise. Tidal volumes (VT) from the RIP were compared with simultaneous flowmeter volumes in 8 healthy subjects at 5 incremental work rates of 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 W during cycling and treadmill exercise. During cycling, average RIP and flowmeter values did not differ significantly at work rates below 180 W for 63% of the subjects. Average RIP and flowmeter VT were similar at work rates below 180 W for 50% of the subjects, and for 83% of the subjects at intensities below 150 W. The variability in these results may be attributed to several factors including RIP calibration errors and slippage of the RIP elastic bands containing the inductive coils. Correlations of breath-by-breath flowmeter and RIP VT were significant for subjects during cycling (R = 0.73, P < 0.05) and treadmill exercise (R = 0.78, P < 0.05). These findings suggest that the RIP should be considered a semi-quantitative method for measurements of tidal volume during exercise with and without respirator wear.
本研究旨在确定运动期间使用呼吸感应体积描记器(RIP)获得的呼吸容积测量值的可靠性。在8名健康受试者进行自行车运动和跑步机运动时,将RIP测得的潮气量(VT)与同时使用流量计测得的潮气量进行比较,运动强度以60、90、120、150和180 W逐步递增。在自行车运动中,对于63%的受试者,在功率低于180 W时,RIP和流量计的平均测量值无显著差异。对于50%的受试者,在功率低于180 W时,RIP和流量计测得的平均VT相似;对于83%的受试者,在强度低于150 W时,两者相似。这些结果的变异性可能归因于几个因素,包括RIP校准误差以及装有感应线圈的RIP弹性带的滑动。在自行车运动(R = 0.73,P < 0.05)和跑步机运动(R = 0.78,P < 0.05)期间,逐次呼吸的流量计和RIP测得的VT之间的相关性对受试者具有显著意义。这些发现表明,无论是否佩戴呼吸器,RIP都应被视为运动期间测量潮气量的一种半定量方法。