Atrioventricular block progression in patients with bifascicular block assessed by repeated electrocardiography and a bradycardia-detecting pacemaker.

Syncope may be due to intermittent high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, but a cause-relation is sometimes difficult to prove. Diagnostic methods with high predictive value proven by instruments for safe and sensitive follow-up are needed. A bradycardia-detecting pacemaker was used in patients with bifascicular block, who had been the subjects of pharmacologic stress testing of the His-Purkinje system. Thirty-seven patients were included, of whom 26 had experienced at least 1 syncopal episode of suspected bradycardia origin, and 11 had previously documented transient high-degree AV block. The electrophysiologic study included injection of disopyramide 2 mg/kg (up to 150 mg) over 5 minutes. A positive test result was defined as spontaneous or pacing-induced His-Purkinje high-degree AV block after drug or a drug-induced HV prolongation of > or = 50%. Patients were followed an average 63 months with repeated electrocardiography and a diagnostic pacemaker (n = 23). Altogether, 24 patients had a significant bradycardia diagnosed by either or both methods. The sensitivity and positive predictive values were: HV interval > or = 70 ms at baseline, 47% and 88%; a positive disopyramide test result, 75% and 80%; and HV interval > or = 70 ms or a positive disopyramide test result, 93% and 74%, respectively. Thus, the diagnostic pacemaker is a safe and sensitive tool for evaluating the information obtained at electrophysiologic study, and pharmacologic stress testing with disopyramide has an informative value in patients with bifascicular block and syncope when results at baseline are inconclusive.