Broder L E, Sridhar K S, Selawry O S, Charyulu K N, Rao R K, Saldana M J, Donnelly E J, Raub W A
Department of Oncology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida 33101.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;17(6):527-37. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199412000-00016.
Initially, 109 evaluable patients with locally advanced or metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with vincristine, Adriamycin, procarbazine, and etoposide (VAPE). Partial (PR) or nonresponders (NR) were crossed to CCM (cyclophosphamide, CCNU, and methotrexate) and then to HMiVe (hexamethylmelamine, mitomycin C, vinblastine) sequentially at maximum response. Complete responders (CR) were intensified by 50% with VAPE primarily and randomized to VAPE, alternating with CCM or CCM alone during maintenance. CR patients with limited disease received local thoracic irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), whereas those with extensive disease received PCI alone. There were 45 patients (41%) who achieved a CR to chemotherapy, and 27 patients were eligible for randomization. Of 12 CR patients randomized to alternating therapy (VAPE/CCM), the median survival was 25.9 months compared to 12.9 months for 15 CR patients randomized to continuous CCM (P = .049). In addition, 35 patients achieved a PR (32%) and 29 were NR (27%). Overall median survivals were significantly different for the CR patients (13.0 months) as compared to PR (7.6 months) and NR patients (6.4 months). Late intensification did not appear to add substantially to survival while contributing to toxicity. In summary, VAPE is a new outpatient regimen for SCLC, which is highly effective as an induction regimen with moderate hematologic toxicity and predominantly gastrointestinal nonhematologic toxicity.
最初,109例可评估的局部晚期或转移性小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者接受了长春新碱、阿霉素、丙卡巴肼和依托泊苷(VAPE)治疗。部分缓解(PR)或无反应者(NR)依次接受环磷酰胺、洛莫司汀和甲氨蝶呤(CCM),然后在最大反应时接受六甲蜜胺、丝裂霉素C、长春碱(HMiVe)治疗。完全缓解者(CR)首先用VAPE强化50%,并随机分为VAPE组,在维持期交替使用CCM或仅使用CCM。疾病局限的CR患者接受局部胸部照射和预防性颅脑照射(PCI),而广泛期疾病患者仅接受PCI。有45例患者(41%)化疗达到CR,27例患者符合随机分组条件。在随机分配到交替治疗组(VAPE/CCM)的12例CR患者中,中位生存期为25.9个月,而随机分配到持续CCM组的15例CR患者中位生存期为12.9个月(P = 0.049)。此外,35例患者达到PR(32%),29例为NR(27%)。CR患者的总体中位生存期(13.0个月)与PR患者(7.6个月)和NR患者(6.4个月)相比有显著差异。晚期强化似乎并未显著延长生存期,反而增加了毒性。总之,VAPE是一种新的SCLC门诊治疗方案,作为诱导方案非常有效,血液学毒性中等,主要为胃肠道非血液学毒性。