• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头影测量标志点有效性对切牙角度的影响。

Effects of cephalometric landmark validity on incisor angulation.

作者信息

Chan C K, Tng T H, Hägg U, Cooke M S

机构信息

Department of Children's Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Nov;106(5):487-95. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70071-0.

DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70071-0
PMID:7977189
Abstract

An experimental cephalometric study on the accuracy of independently locating eight landmarks and the subsequent effects on the maxillary (ILs/NL) and mandibular (ILi/ML) incisor angulation was carried out on 30 dry skulls. The true location of each landmark was marked with a steel ball glued onto the skulls. Two additional steel balls were used as reference markers. A purpose-designed skullholder was made to assure a firm and reproducible positioning of the skulls in the cephalostat. Six series of cephalograms were recorded. One reference series with all the steel balls, four series each with a single steel ball marker removed, one at a time, from each jaw and one series with all the steel ball markers removed, except the reference markers. The combined method error in relocating and replacing the steel ball markers, repositioning the skulls into the skull holder, and digitizing, was low. From the first series, the true position of the palatal plane (NL), the maxillary incisor line (ILs), the mandibular plane (ML) and the mandibular incisor line (ILi) were assessed. From series 2 to 5, each of the landmarks without the steel ball markers was estimated. The accuracy of each landmark was then assessed relative to the true cephalometric plane and its perpendicular. On average, the accuracy was high for all the landmarks except posterior nasal spine (PNS), which was estimated 1.2 mm too far anteriorly (p < 0.05). The standard deviations of the accuracy of the dental and skeletal landmarks were similar, being 1.4 to 2.4 mm. The maxillary incisors were proclined 1.1 degrees (p < 0.05) by the estimates of incision superior (Is).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对30个干燥颅骨进行了一项实验性头影测量研究,以评估独立定位八个标志点的准确性以及对上下颌切牙角度(上颌:ILs/NL;下颌:ILi/ML)的后续影响。每个标志点的真实位置通过粘贴在颅骨上的钢珠进行标记。另外使用两个钢珠作为参考标记。制作了一个专门设计的颅骨固定器,以确保颅骨在头颅定位仪中稳定且可重复定位。记录了六组头影测量片。一组为带有所有钢珠的参考系列,四组分别从每个颌骨上一次移除一个钢珠标记,还有一组移除所有钢珠标记,仅保留参考标记。在重新定位和更换钢珠标记、将颅骨重新放入颅骨固定器以及数字化过程中的综合方法误差较低。从第一组中评估了腭平面(NL)、上颌切牙线(ILs)、下颌平面(ML)和下颌切牙线(ILi)的真实位置。从第2组到第5组,对没有钢珠标记的每个标志点进行估计。然后相对于真实的头影测量平面及其垂线评估每个标志点的准确性。除了后鼻棘(PNS)向前估计偏差1.2毫米(p < 0.05)外,所有标志点的平均准确性都较高。牙齿和骨骼标志点准确性的标准差相似,为1.4至2.4毫米。通过切牙上点(Is)的估计,上颌切牙前倾1.1度(p < 0.05)。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Effects of cephalometric landmark validity on incisor angulation.头影测量标志点有效性对切牙角度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Nov;106(5):487-95. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70071-0.
2
Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls.头影测量标志点的有效性。一项关于人类颅骨的实验研究。
Eur J Orthod. 1994 Apr;16(2):110-20. doi: 10.1093/ejo/16.2.110.
3
The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls.头影测量标志点的可重复性:一项关于颅骨的实验研究。
Aust Orthod J. 1998 Oct;15(3):177-85.
4
Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.后前位头影测量中的标志点识别误差。
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(6):447-54. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0447:LIEIPA>2.0.CO;2.
5
Comparative cephalometric errors for orthodontic and surgical patients.正畸和外科手术患者的头影测量误差比较。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995;10(2):119-26.
6
A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.一种当代切牙倾斜度矫正中确定目标的方法。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Aug;30(4):374-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn015.
7
Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.成人骨性 II 类和 III 类开颌错(牙合)畸形的磨牙高度和切牙倾斜度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Mar;145(3):325-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.001.
8
Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.使用4个参考点的平面定向法影响三维头影测量标志点重叠误差的因素:四点重叠误差回归模型
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 5;9(11):e110665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110665. eCollection 2014.
9
Combined effects of errors in frontal-view asymmetry diagnosis.额面不对称诊断误差的综合影响。
Eur J Orthod. 1996 Dec;18(6):629-36. doi: 10.1093/ejo/18.6.629.
10
Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.使用三维锥形束CT验证传统二维侧位头影测量法
J Orthod. 2013 Mar;40(1):22-8. doi: 10.1179/1465313312Y.0000000009.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative evaluation of concordance and speed between smartphone app-based and artificial intelligence web-based cephalometric tracing software with the manual tracing method: A cross-sectional study.基于智能手机应用程序和基于人工智能的网络头颅测量追踪软件与手工追踪方法之间的一致性和速度的比较评估:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Jan 1;16(1):e11-e17. doi: 10.4317/jced.60899. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Assessment of the quality of different commercial providers using artificial intelligence for automated cephalometric analysis compared to human orthodontic experts.与人类正畸专家相比,评估使用人工智能进行自动头影测量分析的不同商业供应商的质量。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 May;86(3):145-160. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00491-1. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings.基于网络的全自动头影测量分析:应用程序辅助、计算机化和手工描记之间的比较。
Turk J Orthod. 2020 Aug 11;33(3):142-149. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20062. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination : Part 3: Validity of bracket torque values in achieving norm inclinations.协调托槽转矩与切牙倾斜度:第3部分:托槽转矩值在实现正常倾斜度方面的有效性。
J Orofac Orthop. 2018 Sep;79(5):320-327. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0132-6. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
5
Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination : Part 1: The development of widely applicable equations.协调托槽扭矩与切牙倾斜度:第1部分:广泛适用方程的推导
J Orofac Orthop. 2018 May;79(3):157-167. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0129-1. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
6
Assessing lower incisor inclination change: a comparison of four cephalometric methods.评估下切牙倾斜度变化:四种头影测量方法的比较
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):184-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv027. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.二维放射摄影与三维计算机断层扫描在角度头影测量中的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Feb;39(2):100-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/82724776.
8
Three-dimensional interpretation of labiolingual bone width of the lower incisors. Part II.下颌切牙唇舌侧骨宽度的三维解读。第二部分。
J Orofac Orthop. 1996 Jun;57(3):168-85. doi: 10.1007/BF02191880.