Suppr超能文献

学生为何选择基层医疗或非基层医疗职业。专业选择研究小组。

Why students choose a primary care or nonprimary care career. The Specialty Choice Study Group.

作者信息

Fincher R M, Lewis L A, Jackson T W

机构信息

Curriculum Office, Medical College of Georgia School of Medicine, Augusta.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1994 Nov;97(5):410-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90320-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the factors influencing students to choose residency training in primary care (internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics) or nonprimary care specialties and study the combined effect of reported responses on their choice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 12-item questionnaire using a 7-point Likert scale was mailed to the 1,164 graduating seniors from 9 medical schools in 1991. Responses ranged from 1, very negative influence, to 7, very positive influence. Four indicated no influence. The overall response rate was 69%. Univariate analysis of factors associated with specialty choice was done with the Mantel-Haenzsel chi-square test. Odds ratios were calculated for each significant variable without controlling for other variables. Factors found to have univariate significance were then tested for combined significance with logistic regression analysis. The regression was performed on a randomly chosen training sample, and validated on a test sample.

RESULTS

Forty-five percent of respondents chose an internship and planned residency training in a primary care specialty. Factors that remained positively associated with choosing a primary care specialty when controlling for other factors were desire to provide comprehensive care, to keep options open, and to undertake ambulatory care. Desire for monetary reward was negatively associated with choice of a primary care specialty.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive educational experiences in the ambulatory setting should be enhanced, and disparity in remuneration among disciplines reduced.

摘要

目的

分析影响学生选择基层医疗住院医师培训(内科、家庭医学和儿科学)或非基层医疗专业的因素,并研究所报告的各种因素对其选择的综合影响。

材料与方法

1991年,一份采用7分李克特量表的包含12个条目的问卷被邮寄给来自9所医学院校的1164名即将毕业的大四学生。回答从1(非常负面的影响)到7(非常正面的影响),4表示无影响。总体回复率为69%。采用Mantel-Haenzsel卡方检验对与专业选择相关的因素进行单因素分析。在不控制其他变量的情况下,为每个显著变量计算比值比。然后,对发现具有单因素显著性的因素进行逻辑回归分析,以检验其综合显著性。回归分析在一个随机选择的训练样本上进行,并在一个测试样本上进行验证。

结果

45%的受访者选择了实习,并计划在基层医疗专业进行住院医师培训。在控制其他因素时,与选择基层医疗专业仍呈正相关的因素有提供全面护理的愿望、保持选择的开放性以及从事门诊护理。对金钱回报的渴望与选择基层医疗专业呈负相关。

结论

应加强门诊环境中的积极教育体验,并缩小各学科之间的薪酬差距。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验