Okpaku S O, Sibulkin A E, Schenzler C
Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Am J Public Health. 1994 Nov;84(11):1791-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.11.1791.
Disability determinations made by the Disability Determination Service for Social Security Administration (SSA) disability claims due to mental impairment were compared with the independent judgments of a team of mental health workers. The decisions of the Service and the team's agreement with those decisions were predicted from a set of explanatory variables.
One hundred fifty-eight adult applicants for or beneficiaries of SSA benefit programs participated. The team used SSA disability criteria to judge disability based on in-depth interviews.
Team members voted yes, no, or maybe regarding approval for disability. Of the cases approved by the team, 89% were actually allowed by the Disability Determination Service. However, the team could not reach a yes or no decision for almost half of the subjects, contributing to a total agreement with the Service on only 40% of the cases.
Sufficient evidence exists to question the reliability of SSA disability determinations for mental disorders. Although the Disability Determination Service decision for mental impairments can be predicted above chance, a direct test of the reliability of such determinations should be conducted, with particular attention to the effect of the quality of the medical information.
将社会保障管理局(SSA)残疾判定服务部门针对因精神障碍提出的残疾索赔所做出的残疾判定,与一组心理健康工作者的独立判断进行比较。根据一组解释变量预测该服务部门的判定结果以及该团队与这些判定结果的一致性。
158名成年SSA福利项目申请人或受益人参与其中。该团队依据深入访谈,运用SSA残疾标准来判定残疾情况。
团队成员就是否批准残疾申请投票选择“是”“否”或“可能”。在团队批准的案例中,89%实际上被残疾判定服务部门批准。然而,对于近一半的受试者,团队无法做出“是”或“否”的决定,导致与该服务部门在仅40%的案例上达成完全一致。
有充分证据对SSA针对精神障碍的残疾判定的可靠性提出质疑。尽管对精神障碍的残疾判定服务部门的判定结果能以高于随机概率的水平被预测,但应直接测试此类判定的可靠性,尤其要关注医疗信息质量的影响。