McLachlin C M, Mutter G L, Crum C P
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1994 Dec;18(12):1233-9. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199412000-00006.
The vulvar mucosa often demonstrates epithelial nuclear atypia in association with reactive and inflammatory conditions. These nuclear changes are usually mild and can be readily distinguished from vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and human papillomavirus (HPV)-related lesions. In a recent survey of vulvar biopsies in reproductive-aged women, we identified 12 cases of an unusual pattern of atypia associated with multinucleated epithelial cells but lacking the usual stigmata of reactive changes, condyloma, or VIN. The average age of the patients with multinucleated atypia of the vulva (MAV) was 37 years. The multinucleated cells were commonly in the lower to middle epithelial layers and contained between two and 10 nuclei, often with prominent nucleoli. In contrast to condyloma and VIN, there was no surface atypia, and the multinucleated cells lacked hyperchromasia, irregularity, or variation in nuclear size. No significant inflammation or identifiable infectious process was present, and none of the patients had received any topical treatment other than mild corticosteroids. Two of the patients had a history of VIN at a noncontiguous site. None of the 12 cases contained HPV DNA by either in situ hybridization or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. This is in contrast to 49 of 65 women with VIN and 21 of 26 with condyloma who had HPV demonstrable by the PCR method (p < 0.00001). Immunoperoxidase stains for herpes types I and II were also negative in all the cases. Thus, MAV appears to be a distinct entity occurring in relatively young women; when it is not associated with condyloma or VIN, MAV is not related to HPV. As the morphologic features may overlap with both condyloma and VIN, it is important that MAV not be confused with these lesions or vice versa. It is not known whether MAV is a risk factor for VIN, represents an exaggerated reactive response, or is an entity with a distinct origin.
外阴黏膜在反应性和炎症性病变时常常表现出上皮细胞核异型性。这些核改变通常较轻,很容易与外阴上皮内瘤变(VIN)和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关病变区分开来。在最近一项针对育龄期女性外阴活检的调查中,我们发现了12例不寻常的异型性模式,与多核上皮细胞有关,但缺乏反应性改变、尖锐湿疣或VIN的常见特征。外阴多核异型性(MAV)患者的平均年龄为37岁。多核细胞通常位于上皮的中下层,含有2至10个核,核仁常较明显。与尖锐湿疣和VIN不同,表面无异型性,多核细胞无核深染、核不规则或核大小变异。没有明显的炎症或可识别的感染过程,除了轻度皮质类固醇外,没有患者接受过任何局部治疗。2例患者在非相邻部位有VIN病史。通过原位杂交或聚合酶链反应(PCR)限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析,12例病例均未检测到HPV DNA。这与65例VIN患者中的49例以及26例尖锐湿疣患者中的21例形成对比,这些患者通过PCR方法可检测到HPV(p<0.00001)。所有病例的I型和II型疱疹免疫过氧化物酶染色也均为阴性。因此,MAV似乎是一种发生在相对年轻女性中的独特病变;当它与尖锐湿疣或VIN无关时,MAV与HPV无关。由于其形态学特征可能与尖锐湿疣和VIN重叠,重要的是不要将MAV与这些病变混淆,反之亦然。尚不清楚MAV是VIN的危险因素、代表一种过度的反应性反应,还是一种具有独特起源的病变。