O'Connor T C, Abram S E
Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.
Anesthesiology. 1994 Nov;81(5):1277-83. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199411000-00023.
Injection of formalin in the hindpaw of the rat induces intense C-fiber activity accompanied by brief flinching of the injected paw (phase 1) and gives rise to facilitated spinal processing characterized by renewed flinching beginning 15 min after injury and lasting 40 min or more (phase 2). In previous work, isoflurane, administered during phase 1, slightly reduced phase-2 activity, whereas the addition of intrathecal morphine dramatically inhibited phase 2, even with naloxone reversal 6 min after the formalin injection. We used a similar model to determine whether intrathecal morphine could block spinal sensitization in the absence of inhalation anesthetic.
Hot plate tests at 52 degrees C and radiant heat-evoked hindpaw withdrawal tests were used to determine optimal doses of agonists and antagonists. The formalin test was carried out on male Sprague-Dawley rats, which were divided into five groups. A combination of naloxone 0.5 mg/kg and naltrexone 0.5 mg/kg was administered subcutaneously 6 min after the formalin injection to all animals except controls (group 1) to prevent ongoing opioid effect. Groups 1-3 received intrathecal saline, and groups 4 and 5 received intrathecal morphine 30 micrograms 20 min before formalin injection. Halothane was administered for 1-2 min to facilitate formalin injection for groups 1, 2, and 4. In groups 3 and 5 halothane was administered from 5 min before to 6 min after formalin injection. The number of flinches per minute was counted 1 and 5 min after formalin administration and thereafter at 5-min intervals for 1 h. The total number of flinches at 1 and 5 min was considered as phase-1 activity, and the total number of flinches during the 10-60-min interval was considered as phase 2.
Phase-2 activity for groups 1 and 2 was nearly identical, demonstrating no appreciable effect of the opioid antagonists alone. Groups 3 (halothane alone) and 4 (morphine alone) exhibited a significant decrease in phase-2 activity. Group 5 (morphine plus halothane) demonstrated a profound decrease in phase-2 activity, which was significantly more profound than that of groups 3 or 4.
Intrathecal morphine, administered before formalin injection but antagonized before the onset of phase 2 of the formalin test, significantly suppresses sensitization of dorsal horn neurons. This suppression is significantly increased by coadministration of halothane anesthesia.
向大鼠后爪注射福尔马林会引发强烈的C纤维活动,同时伴有注射爪短暂的退缩(第1阶段),并导致脊髓加工过程的易化,其特征为在损伤后15分钟开始再次出现退缩,并持续40分钟或更长时间(第2阶段)。在之前的研究中,在第1阶段给予异氟烷,可使第2阶段的活动略有减少,而鞘内注射吗啡则可显著抑制第2阶段,即使在福尔马林注射后6分钟用纳洛酮进行逆转也是如此。我们使用类似的模型来确定在没有吸入麻醉剂的情况下鞘内注射吗啡是否能阻断脊髓敏化。
采用52℃热板试验和辐射热诱发的后爪退缩试验来确定激动剂和拮抗剂的最佳剂量。对雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠进行福尔马林试验,将其分为五组。除对照组(第1组)外,所有动物在福尔马林注射后6分钟皮下注射0.5mg/kg纳洛酮和0.5mg/kg纳曲酮的组合,以防止持续的阿片类药物作用。第1 - 3组接受鞘内注射生理盐水,第4组和第5组在福尔马林注射前20分钟接受鞘内注射30微克吗啡。对第1、2和4组给予氟烷1 - 2分钟以利于福尔马林注射。第3组和第5组在福尔马林注射前5分钟至注射后6分钟给予氟烷。在福尔马林注射后1分钟和5分钟计数每分钟的退缩次数,此后每隔5分钟计数1小时。将1分钟和5分钟时的退缩总数视为第1阶段活动,将10 - 60分钟间隔内的退缩总数视为第2阶段。
第1组和第2组的第2阶段活动几乎相同,表明单独使用阿片类拮抗剂没有明显效果。第3组(仅使用氟烷)和第4组(仅使用吗啡)的第2阶段活动显著降低。第5组(吗啡加氟烷)的第2阶段活动显著降低,且比第3组或第4组的降低更为显著。
在福尔马林注射前给予鞘内吗啡,但在福尔马林试验第2阶段开始前进行拮抗,可显著抑制背角神经元的敏化。氟烷麻醉联合使用可显著增强这种抑制作用。