Mayne T J, Norcross J C, Sayette M A
Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California at San Francisco.
Am Psychol. 1994 Sep;49(9):806-11. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.49.9.806.
129 directors (80% response) of APA-accredited clinical psychology programs provided information pertaining to admission requirements, acceptance rates, financial assistance, and theoretical orientations. Summary data are presented and comparisons are made among 4 types of clinical programs: PsyD programs, practice-oriented PhD programs, equal-emphasis PhD programs, and research-oriented PhD programs. Clinical doctoral programs held similar expectations for undergraduate preparation in psychology, but robust differences emerged on preferred Graduate Record Examination scores, acceptance rates, and financial assistance. In the most extreme comparison (PsyD vs. research-oriented PhD programs), students were 4 times more likely to gain acceptance but 6 times less likely to receive full financial assistance in PsyD programs. Implications of these results for potential graduate students and for the future of applied psychology programs are briefly discussed.
129位美国心理学会(APA)认证的临床心理学项目主任(回复率80%)提供了有关入学要求、录取率、经济资助和理论取向的信息。文中呈现了汇总数据,并对4种临床项目进行了比较:心理学博士(PsyD)项目、注重实践的哲学博士(PhD)项目、同等侧重的PhD项目以及侧重研究的PhD项目。临床博士项目对心理学本科预备课程有着相似的期望,但在研究生入学考试(GRE)的理想分数、录取率和经济资助方面出现了显著差异。在最极端的比较中(PsyD项目与侧重研究的PhD项目),PsyD项目的学生被录取的可能性高出4倍,但获得全额经济资助的可能性低6倍。文中简要讨论了这些结果对潜在研究生以及应用心理学项目未来的影响。