Suppr超能文献

Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of six D-dimer latex assays.

作者信息

Charles L A, Edwards T, Macik B G

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1994 Nov;118(11):1102-5.

PMID:7979895
Abstract

The results of six commercially available D-Dimer latex assays were compared with those obtained by two D-Dimer enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; this comparison was done by assessing the sensitivity and specificity of the assays. Results indicated that five of the six latex assays were unable to detect consistently D-Dimer levels (ie, equal to the claims stated in the manufacturers' package inserts). Performance, in order of decreasing sensitivity ([true positive/(true positive+false negative)] as compared with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results), was as follows: ACCUCLOT D-Dimer (Sigma Diagnostics, St Louis, Mo) (93.8%) greater than Fibrinosticon (Organon Teknika Corp, Durham, NC) (81.3%) greater than D-Di Test (Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France) (68.8%) greater than Dade Dimer-test Latex Assay (Baxter Diagnostics Inc, Miami, Fla) (59.4%) greater than Dimertest Latex Kit (American Diagnostica Inc, Greenwich, Conn) and DimerKlone (Ortho Diagnostic Systems Inc, Raritan, NJ) (56.3%). The estimated sensitivity for the lowest sensitivity assays (group 1) (American Diagnostica Inc, Ortho Diagnostic Systems, and Dade Diagnostics) was approximately 1.5 mg/L; the estimated sensitivity for the moderate sensitivity assays (group 2) (Organon Teknika Corp and Diagnostica Stago) was approximately 1.0 mg/L; and the estimated sensitivity for the highest sensitivity assay (group 3) (Sigma Chemical Co) approached a detection limit in the 0.25- to 0.50-mg/L range.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验