• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将急诊科与医院附属诊所相联系以对学龄前儿童进行免疫接种的潜在影响。

Potential impact of linking an emergency department and hospital-affiliated clinics to immunize pre-school-age children.

作者信息

Bell L M, Lopez N I, Pinto-Martin J, Casey R, Gill F M

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19104.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1994 Jan;93(1):99-103.

PMID:7980737
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the use of an urban pediatric emergency department (ED) to immunize pre-school-age children would result in an improvement in the percentage fully vaccinated by the end of the second year of life.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of two groups: (1) 100 consecutive children (ED group) enrolled at one of two hospital-affiliated primary care clinics were chosen from the ED patient logs if their second birthday occurred in the 12 months prior to November 1990; and (2) 91 age-matched control children (control group) were chosen at random from the same hospital-affiliated clinics' enrollment logs without regard to ED use. The health care provided during the first 2 years of life for each group was compared.

RESULTS

The mean number of visits to the ED in the first 2 years of life by the ED group was significantly greater than that of the control group (2.9 [SD] +/- 2.5 vs 1.1 +/- 1.4; P < .001) during the first 2 years of life. In 67% of ED visits, children would have been well enough to receive a vaccination. Both groups had similar types and numbers of visits to the primary clinics. For example, the ED group had 10 +/- 5 visits by age 2 years compared with the control group, which had 9 +/- 4 visits. There was no significant difference in actual immunization percentages achieved in the clinic, with 62% of the ED group having received four diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus vaccinations; three oral poliovirus vaccinations; and one measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination by age 2 compared with 69% of control children. There were more missed vaccination opportunities during clinic visits in the ED group (7.4 vs 4.6 per 100 clinic visits; P < .01). If immunizations were offered in the ED to those children who needed them, immunization percentages would have been increased an average of 20% compared with percentages achieved in the clinic alone.

CONCLUSION

Routine vaccinations in the ED would significantly increase immunization percentages in children enrolled in two hospital-affiliated clinics. Close linkage and coordination between the ED and hospital-affiliated clinics may improve preventive health care in urban children who use EDs.

摘要

目的

确定利用城市儿科急诊科(ED)为学龄前儿童进行免疫接种是否会使两岁末时完全接种疫苗的儿童百分比得到提高。

设计

一项对两组进行的回顾性队列研究:(1)从两家医院附属基层医疗诊所之一登记的100名连续儿童(急诊科组),如果他们的第二个生日发生在1990年11月前的12个月内,则从急诊科患者记录中选取;(2)91名年龄匹配的对照儿童(对照组)从同一家医院附属诊所的登记记录中随机选取,不考虑是否使用过急诊科。比较了两组儿童在生命最初两年所接受的医疗保健情况。

结果

在生命的头两年,急诊科组儿童到急诊科就诊的平均次数显著多于对照组(2.9[标准差]±2.5次对1.1±1.4次;P<.001)。在67%的急诊科就诊中,儿童的健康状况足以接受疫苗接种。两组到基层诊所就诊的类型和次数相似。例如,急诊科组在两岁时就诊10±5次,而对照组就诊9±4次。两组在诊所实际实现的免疫接种百分比没有显著差异,到两岁时,急诊科组62%的儿童接受了四次白喉、百日咳和破伤风疫苗接种;三次口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种;一次麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗接种,而对照儿童为69%。急诊科组在诊所就诊期间错过的疫苗接种机会更多(每100次诊所就诊7.4次对4.6次;P<.01)。如果在急诊科为那些需要的儿童提供免疫接种,与仅在诊所实现的百分比相比,免疫接种百分比平均将提高20%。

结论

在急诊科进行常规疫苗接种将显著提高两家医院附属诊所登记儿童的免疫接种百分比。急诊科与医院附属诊所之间的紧密联系与协调可能会改善使用急诊科的城市儿童的预防性医疗保健。

相似文献

1
Potential impact of linking an emergency department and hospital-affiliated clinics to immunize pre-school-age children.将急诊科与医院附属诊所相联系以对学龄前儿童进行免疫接种的潜在影响。
Pediatrics. 1994 Jan;93(1):99-103.
2
Utilization and costs for children who have special health care needs and are enrolled in a hospital-based comprehensive primary care clinic.有特殊医疗需求且在医院综合初级保健诊所登记的儿童的医疗服务利用情况及费用
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e637-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2084.
3
Use of health care services by inner-city infants in an early discharge program.内城区婴儿在早期出院计划中对医疗保健服务的使用情况。
Pediatrics. 1996 Oct;98(4 Pt 1):686-91.
4
Impact of a decline in Colorado Medicaid managed care enrollment on access and quality of preventive primary care services.科罗拉多医疗补助管理式医疗参保人数下降对预防性初级保健服务的可及性和质量的影响。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1474-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0923.
5
Is an emergency department visit a marker for undervaccination and missed vaccination opportunities among children who have access to primary care?对于有机会获得初级保健服务的儿童,急诊就诊是否是疫苗接种不足和错过疫苗接种机会的一个指标?
Pediatrics. 1993 Mar;91(3):605-11.
6
Placement changes and emergency department visits in the first year of foster care.寄养照护第一年中的安置变化及急诊就诊情况
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):e354-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-0594-F.
7
Immunization opportunities missed among urban poor children.城市贫困儿童错过的免疫接种机会。
Pediatrics. 1992 Jun;89(6 Pt 1):1019-26.
8
Cost and utilization analysis of a pediatric emergency department diversion project.儿科急诊科分流项目的成本与利用情况分析
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1075-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2093.
9
Avoiding missed opportunities for immunization in the Central African Republic: potential impact on vaccination coverage.避免中非共和国免疫接种的机会错失:对疫苗接种覆盖率的潜在影响
Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(1):47-55.
10
A comprehensive inner-city asthma program reduces hospital and emergency room utilization.一项全面的市中心哮喘项目降低了医院和急诊室的利用率。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Feb;86(2):185-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62689-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of populations vaccinated in a public service and in a private hospital setting in the same area.同一地区公共服务机构和私立医院接种人群的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Aug 6;8:278. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-278.
2
Effectiveness of pediatric practice consultation on missed opportunities for immunization.儿科实践咨询对免疫接种错失机会的有效性。
J Urban Health. 1998 Mar;75(1):123-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02344934.
3
Preventive care in emergency departments.急诊科的预防保健
West J Med. 1996 Jan;164(1):68.