Suppr超能文献

甲基百里香酚蓝分光光度法与原子吸收分光光度法测定镁的比较。

Comparison of the determination of magnesium by methylthymol blue spectrophotometry and atomic absorption spectrophotometry.

作者信息

Saur P M, Zielmann S, Roth A, Frank L, Warneke G, Ensink F B, Radke A

机构信息

Zentrum für Anaesthesiologie, Rettungs-und Intensivmedizin, Georg August Universität Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1994 Jul;32(7):539-42. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1994.32.7.539.

Abstract

Plasma samples (n = 155) of 30 patients on an intensive ward were analysed for magnesium simultaneously by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) and methylthymol blue spectrophotometry. Methylthymol blue spectrophotometry was performed at the bedside, using two different multianalysers, Easy ST 1 and Easy ST 2, Merck, D-Darmstadt. Precision was 12.2% (Easy ST 1) and 17.1% (Easy ST 2), and the average value was 0.89 mmol/l, which was above the expected range (0.72-0.88 mmol/l). Accuracy was 16.25% (Easy ST 1) and 8.75% (Easy ST 2). Analyser 2 was more accurate (8.75% versus 6.25%) but less precise (17.1% versus 12.2%) than analyser 1. Precision of AAS was between the expected values of 0.69 and 0.84 mmol/l. Easy ST and AAS gave significantly different values (p < 0.0001) for 155 measurements. Comparison of AAS and methylthymol blue spectrophotometery showed that methylthymol blue spectrophotometry produced higher values than AAS (mean difference 0.186 mmol/l). Furthermore, analyses of 40 samples of a standardized plasma concentration with methylthymol blue spectrophotometry showed a very low precision (15.3%). Easy ST cannot be assigned for urinary measurements of magnesium. Experimentally measured samples gave unaccountable results.

摘要

对重症监护病房的30名患者的155份血浆样本,同时采用原子吸收分光光度法(AAS)和甲基百里酚蓝分光光度法分析镁含量。甲基百里酚蓝分光光度法在床边使用两种不同的多分析仪(默克公司,德国达姆施塔特,Easy ST 1和Easy ST 2)进行。精密度分别为12.2%(Easy ST 1)和17.1%(Easy ST 2),平均值为0.89 mmol/L,高于预期范围(0.72 - 0.88 mmol/L)。准确度分别为16.25%(Easy ST 1)和8.75%(Easy ST 2)。分析仪2比分析仪1更准确(8.75%对6.25%)但精密度更低(17.1%对12.2%)。AAS的精密度在预期值0.69至0.84 mmol/L之间。Easy ST和AAS对155次测量给出了显著不同的值(p < 0.0001)。AAS与甲基百里酚蓝分光光度法的比较表明,甲基百里酚蓝分光光度法产生的值高于AAS(平均差值0.186 mmol/L)。此外,用甲基百里酚蓝分光光度法对40份标准化血浆浓度样本进行分析,结果显示精密度非常低(15.3%)。Easy ST不能用于镁的尿液测量。实验测量的样本给出了无法解释的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验