• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

没有公共卫生的全民医疗保健改革:失败的方案。

National health care reform minus public health: a formula for failure.

作者信息

Freeman P, Robbins A

机构信息

John W. McCormack Institute of Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts, Boston 02125-3393.

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 1994 Autumn;15(3):261-82.

PMID:7983190
Abstract

Universal access to medical services will not address all important health needs. Impending health care reform, guided by public health strategies, could achieve many previously unattainable health goals. However, such a public health role seems unlikely. Public health reaches beyond the current popular notion of prevention focused on individual lifestyle, yet attention to public health authority has waned. The history of immunization, a personal health service effective only within a public health strategy, illustrates the dilemma. Britain required 40 years of National Health Service before it invoked a public health strategy to assure effective immunization. Reformed health care must perform certain functions systematically that in the past were optional for medical practitioners or left to health departments by default. Reformers must rebuild public health authority in states, to assure that medical services we will pay for under health care reform accomplish functions critical to the health of the public.

摘要

普及医疗服务并不能满足所有重要的健康需求。在公共卫生战略的指导下即将进行的医疗改革,可能会实现许多以前无法实现的健康目标。然而,这样的公共卫生角色似乎不太可能实现。公共卫生的范畴超出了当前流行的、专注于个人生活方式的预防观念,但对公共卫生权威的关注却有所减弱。免疫接种的历史就说明了这一困境,免疫接种作为一项个人健康服务,只有在公共卫生战略中才会有效。英国在实施了40年的国民医疗服务体系后,才采用公共卫生战略来确保有效的免疫接种。改革后的医疗保健必须系统地履行某些过去对医生来说是可选择的或默认留给卫生部门的职能。改革者必须重建各州的公共卫生权威,以确保我们在医疗改革下支付费用的医疗服务能够履行对公众健康至关重要的职能。

相似文献

1
National health care reform minus public health: a formula for failure.没有公共卫生的全民医疗保健改革:失败的方案。
J Public Health Policy. 1994 Autumn;15(3):261-82.
2
Principles of state health reform: many states not willing to wait for federal reform.
Health Care Law Newsl. 1994 Jul;9(7):3-7.
3
Health care reform in Vermont: the next chapter.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Winter;13(5):78-103. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.5.78.
4
Health care reform bill introduced.
Minn Med. 2007 Apr;90(4):26-7.
5
Building blocks for reform: achieving universal coverage with private and public group health insurance.改革的基石:通过公私团体医疗保险实现全民覆盖
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):646-57. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.646.
6
Reform group puts forward bill.改革团体提出法案。
Minn Med. 2007 Mar;90(3):22.
7
Health coverage in the states--Maine's plan for universal access.美国各州的医保覆盖情况——缅因州的全民医保计划。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 22;350(4):330-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp038226.
8
An American approach to health system reform.美国的医疗体系改革之路。
JAMA. 1991 May 15;265(19):2537-40.
9
Can Massachusetts lead the way in health care reform?马萨诸塞州能在医疗保健改革方面引领潮流吗?
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 18;354(20):2093-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068103.
10
Health care reform and the role of public health agencies.医疗保健改革与公共卫生机构的作用。
J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(2):153-69.

引用本文的文献

1
How organized medical care can advance public health.有组织的医疗保健如何促进公众健康。
Public Health Rep. 1999 Mar-Apr;114(2):120-5. doi: 10.1093/phr/114.2.120.