• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究中的伦理:牙科研究人员及其专业协会面临的当前问题。

Ethics in research: current issues for dental researchers and their professional society.

作者信息

Frankel M S

机构信息

Program on Scientific Freedom, Responsibility and Law, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC 20005.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 1994 Nov;73(11):1759-65. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730111301.

DOI:10.1177/00220345940730111301
PMID:7983263
Abstract

Values associated with scientific investigations affect the conduct, evaluation, and reporting of research and lead to ethical issues for scientists engaged in dental research. This essay examines the relationship between scientists and the larger society in which they work, and how that relationship defines the boundaries of scientific freedom and autonomy, on the one hand, and scientific responsibility and accountability, on the other. Values underlie disputes over data sharing, perceptions of conflict of interest, and scientists' commitment to research integrity. Professional societies, such as the IADR, can be a major influence in shaping the moral tone and ethical climate for research through the adoption of standards, the development of educational programs designed to reinforce those standards, and the public recognition of responsible conduct on the part of scientists.

摘要

与科学研究相关的价值观会影响研究的开展、评估和报告,并给从事牙科研究的科学家带来伦理问题。本文探讨了科学家与其工作所在的更广泛社会之间的关系,以及这种关系如何一方面界定了科学自由和自主性的边界,另一方面界定了科学责任和问责制的边界。价值观是数据共享争议、利益冲突认知以及科学家对研究诚信承诺的基础。像国际牙科研究协会(IADR)这样的专业协会,可以通过采用标准、制定旨在强化这些标准的教育项目以及公开认可科学家的负责任行为,对塑造研究的道德基调与伦理氛围产生重大影响。

相似文献

1
Ethics in research: current issues for dental researchers and their professional society.研究中的伦理:牙科研究人员及其专业协会面临的当前问题。
J Dent Res. 1994 Nov;73(11):1759-65. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730111301.
2
The moral foundations of scientific ethics and responsibility.科学伦理与责任的道德基础。
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):825-31. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021501.
3
The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.科学研究的伦理:对科学家和机构代表焦点小组的分析
J Investig Med. 1997 Aug;45(6):371-80.
4
Sharing statistical data in the biomedical and health sciences: ethical, institutional, legal, and professional dimensions.生物医学与健康科学领域的统计数据共享:伦理、机构、法律及专业层面
Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:1-18. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.000245.
5
Beyond conflict of interest: the responsible conduct of research.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Jul;8(3):459-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0068-4.
6
Ethics in dental research. Toward developing a code of ethics.牙科研究中的伦理。迈向制定伦理准则。
J Dent Res. 1994 Nov;73(11):1783-7. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730111701.
7
Character and the ethical conduct of research.研究的性质与伦理行为
Account Res. 1992;2(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/08989629208573802.
8
Survey of ethical issues in dental research.牙科研究中的伦理问题调查
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):845-55. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021901.
9
What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.科研行为责任方面的指导与培训和科学家的不当行为有何关系?来自一项对美国国立卫生研究院资助科学家的全国性调查的结果。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):853-60. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c.
10
Roles for scientific societies in promoting integrity in publication ethics.科学协会在促进出版伦理诚信方面的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):221-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0010-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics in prosthodontic research.口腔修复学研究中的伦理学
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jan-Mar;20(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_455_19. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
2
Identifying bioethical issues in biostatistical consulting: findings from a US national pilot survey of biostatisticians.识别生物统计学咨询中的生物伦理问题:来自美国生物统计学家全国性试点调查的结果
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e018491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018491.
3
Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: evidence from ORI case files.研究不端行为的相关因果因素:来自美国国立卫生研究院科研诚信办公室案例档案的证据
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):395-414. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2. Epub 2007 Nov 24.
4
A code of ethics for the life sciences.生命科学伦理准则。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Mar;13(1):25-43. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0007-x.