• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学伦理与责任的道德基础。

The moral foundations of scientific ethics and responsibility.

作者信息

Camenisch P F

机构信息

Department of Religious Studies, DePaul University, Chicago, Ilinois 60614, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):825-31. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021501.

DOI:10.1177/00220345960750021501
PMID:8655782
Abstract

Any significant involvement of AADR/IADR in ensuring responsible research among their members must be grounded in a widely accepted consensus that there are good moral reasons for such involvement. One important source of such reasons is AADR/IADR's identity as a scientific research, a professional, and a dental association. These identities and the commitments to society and to clients implicit in them generate several mutually reinforcing reasons for taking responsibility for the reliability of members' research. With regard to scientific research, these reasons arise from what it means to do such research, and from the various ways the larger society supports that activity. With regard to the professional dimension, the reasons arise from what it means to be a profession in this society and can be best seen in relation to the four major characteristics of professions. With regard to AADR/IADR's being a dental profession, such reasons arise from dental researchers' specific role in the dental family of professions' goal of delivering optimal care to the clients of practitioners. The clients' perspective, specifically the need to be able to trust that one will receive the best care possible, is a final source for such reasons. Two current issues, the sharing of findings and commercial/industrial support for research, give new urgency to this question of the Association's role in ensuring responsible research.

摘要

美国牙科研究协会(AADR)/国际牙科研究协会(IADR)在确保其成员进行负责任的研究方面的任何重大参与,都必须基于一种广泛接受的共识,即这种参与存在充分的道德理由。这些理由的一个重要来源是AADR/IADR作为一个科学研究、专业和牙科协会的身份。这些身份以及其中隐含的对社会和客户的承诺,产生了几个相互强化的理由,促使其对成员研究的可靠性负责。就科学研究而言,这些理由源于进行此类研究的意义,以及更广泛社会支持该活动的各种方式。就专业层面而言,这些理由源于在这个社会中成为一个专业意味着什么,并且在与专业的四个主要特征相关的方面可以最好地看到。就AADR/IADR作为一个牙科专业而言,这些理由源于牙科研究人员在牙科专业家族为从业者的客户提供最佳护理的目标中的特定作用。客户的观点,特别是需要能够相信自己将获得尽可能最好的护理,是这些理由的最终来源。当前的两个问题,即研究结果的分享和研究的商业/工业支持,使协会在确保负责任研究方面的作用这一问题有了新的紧迫性。

相似文献

1
The moral foundations of scientific ethics and responsibility.科学伦理与责任的道德基础。
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):825-31. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021501.
2
Survey of ethical issues in dental research.牙科研究中的伦理问题调查
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):845-55. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021901.
3
The role of the AADR in promoting research integrity: perspectives and consensus statements.美国牙科研究协会在促进研究诚信方面的作用:观点与共识声明。
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):856-60. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750022001.
4
American Dental Hyqiene Association: Code of Ethics for Dental Hygienists.美国牙科保健员协会:牙科保健员职业道德规范。
J Am Coll Dent. 2015 Fall;82(4):32-4.
5
Ethics in research: current issues for dental researchers and their professional society.研究中的伦理:牙科研究人员及其专业协会面临的当前问题。
J Dent Res. 1994 Nov;73(11):1759-65. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730111301.
6
American Dental Education Association: Statement of Professionalism in Dental Education.美国牙科教育协会:牙科教育中的专业精神声明。
J Am Coll Dent. 2015 Fall;82(4):27-31.
7
Proceedings of a symposium, toward responsible research conduct: the role of scientific societies.一场关于负责任的研究行为:科学学会的作用的研讨会会议记录
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):823-4. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021401.
8
Moral Communities and Moral Leadership.道德社群与道德领导力。
J Am Coll Dent. 2015 Fall;82(4):60-75.
9
The relationship of the profession(al) to society.专业人士与社会的关系。
J Dent Educ. 1985 Apr;49(4):207-13.
10
Promoting responsible conduct: striving for change rather than consensus. Commentary on "Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research" (F. Grinnell).促进负责任的行为:追求变革而非共识。对《模糊性、信任与研究的负责任行为》(F. 格林内尔)的评论
Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):219-28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0013-x.