Suppr超能文献

透析器复用对透析治疗的影响。

The effect of dialyzer reuse on dialysis delivery.

作者信息

Sherman R A, Cody R P, Rogers M E, Solanchick J C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick 08903.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 1994 Dec;24(6):924-6. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)81062-6.

Abstract

It is well documented that the reprocessing of dialyzers may reduce their solute clearance capabilities. However, the effect of dialyzer reuse has never been assessed in an uncontrolled clinical practice setting. We addressed this issue in a prospective 436-patient, 34-center study. All patients underwent formal urea kinetic modeling monthly, usually for 3 sequential months. Dialyzers were reprocessed and reused in the usual manner for each unit. As a result, urea kinetic modeling was performed in individual patients using dialyzers with differing numbers of prior uses. For each patient, Kt/V urea for the treatment using the dialyzer with the most reuses (mean, 13.8) was compared with that with the treatment using the dialyzer with the fewest reuses (mean, 3.8). The mean Kt/V delivered for high reuse treatments was significantly lower than that for low reuse treatments (1.05 v 1.10, P = 0.002). Prescribed Kt/V in high and low reuse treatments was identical. Individual centers appeared to differ substantially (P = 0.06) in the effect of reuse on delivered Kt/V. Of the 23 centers using formalin-based reprocessing, an average difference of > or = 0.12 (mean, 0.17) in Kt/V between high and low reuse treatments was seen in 10 centers. Dialyzer reprocessing significantly impairs dialysis delivery, an effect that may be related to the methods and procedures in individual dialysis centers.

摘要

有充分文献记载,透析器的再处理可能会降低其溶质清除能力。然而,从未在无对照的临床实践环境中评估过透析器复用的效果。我们在一项有436名患者参与、34个中心的前瞻性研究中解决了这个问题。所有患者每月进行一次正规的尿素动力学建模,通常连续进行3个月。每个单位的透析器都以常规方式进行再处理和复用。结果,对使用不同复用次数透析器的个体患者进行了尿素动力学建模。对于每位患者,将使用复用次数最多的透析器(平均13.8次)进行治疗的尿素Kt/V与使用复用次数最少的透析器(平均3.8次)进行治疗的尿素Kt/V进行比较。高复用治疗的平均Kt/V显著低于低复用治疗(1.05对1.10,P = 0.002)。高复用和低复用治疗中规定的Kt/V相同。各个中心在复用对所输送Kt/V的影响方面似乎有很大差异(P = 0.06)。在使用基于福尔马林再处理的23个中心中,10个中心在高复用和低复用治疗之间的Kt/V平均差异≥0.12(平均0.17)。透析器再处理会显著损害透析效果,这种影响可能与各个透析中心的方法和程序有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验