Diamond A, Towle C, Boyer K
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.
Behav Neurosci. 1994 Aug;108(4):659-80. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.108.4.659.
Delayed nonmatching-to-sample performance was examined in children and found to be poor from 12 months until almost 2 years even at 5-s delay, although 5 s is well within such children's memory capacity. After 12 months of age, performance did not differ by delay (5 or 30 s). Because children's problems seemed largely unrelated to the task's memory demands, the 2 final studies explored the role of other cognitive abilities (deduction of an abstract rule, speed of processing, and resistance to interference or distraction). Telling children the rule or quadrupling sample presentation time had little effect. Because a salient stimulus (the reward) might interfere with keeping one's attention on the sample, the reward was omitted during initial sample presentation. This helped; at the 5-s delay, 15-month-olds performed at least as well as 21-month-olds in the basic condition, and 12-month-olds performed almost as well. Implications for the cognitive abilities improving during the 2nd year and for the functions of the medial temporal lobe are discussed.
研究人员对儿童的延迟非匹配样本任务表现进行了考察,发现从12个月到将近2岁,即使延迟5秒,他们的表现也很差,尽管5秒完全在这些儿童的记忆能力范围内。12个月大以后,不同延迟时间(5秒或30秒)下的表现没有差异。由于儿童的问题似乎在很大程度上与任务的记忆要求无关,最后两项研究探讨了其他认知能力(抽象规则的推导、处理速度以及抗干扰或抗分心能力)的作用。告诉儿童规则或将样本呈现时间增加四倍几乎没有效果。由于一个突出的刺激物(奖励)可能会干扰对样本的注意力,因此在初始样本呈现期间省略了奖励。这起到了作用;在5秒延迟时,15个月大的儿童在基本条件下的表现至少与21个月大的儿童一样好,12个月大的儿童表现也几乎一样好。本文还讨论了第二年认知能力提升以及内侧颞叶功能的相关意义。