Bennett J M, Catovsky D, Daniel M T, Flandrin G, Galton D A, Gralnick H, Sultan C, Cox C
University of Rochester Cancer Center, NY 14642.
Br J Haematol. 1994 Aug;87(4):746-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1994.tb06734.x.
We have reviewed our experience with four of the entities that are included under the generic term chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), namely the classic Ph+ CGL, both BCR+ and BCR-, aCML and CMML. We have developed a statistical model that confirms that CGL, aCML and CMML can be distinguished from each other with reasonable success employing five quantitative parameters (WBC, percentage immature granulocytes, percentage monocytes, percentage basophils, percentage erythroid precursors in bone marrow) and one qualitative parameter (granulocytic dysplasia). It is hoped that these detailed recommendations will enable investigators to improve their diagnostic accuracy. This should permit more uniform comparisons of molecular biologic and clinical studies.
我们回顾了我们对慢性髓性白血病(CML)这一通用术语下包含的四个实体的经验,即经典的Ph+慢性粒细胞白血病(CGL),包括BCR+和BCR-两种,不典型慢性髓性白血病(aCML)和慢性粒-单核细胞白血病(CMML)。我们开发了一种统计模型,该模型证实,利用五个定量参数(白细胞计数、未成熟粒细胞百分比、单核细胞百分比、嗜碱性粒细胞百分比、骨髓中红系前体细胞百分比)和一个定性参数(粒细胞发育异常),可以较为成功地区分CGL、aCML和CMML。希望这些详细建议能使研究人员提高诊断准确性。这将有助于分子生物学和临床研究进行更统一的比较。