Suppr超能文献

[癫痫患者三种心理社会康复形式的比较]

[Comparison of 3 forms of psychosocial rehabilitation in patients with epilepsy].

作者信息

Preiss J

机构信息

Psychiatrické oddĕlení FP pri 2. FN, Praha.

出版信息

Cesk Psychiatr. 1994 Aug;90(4):216-24.

PMID:7987932
Abstract

The submitted paper is based on experience 1. with enlisting epileptic patients in programmes for neurotic patients during hospitalization (1968 - 1983, a total of 20 patients), 2. an ambulatory psychotherapeutic group for epileptic patients only (period 1983 - 1989, a total of 41 subjects, i.e. 39 patients and two mothers of patients) and 3. a club for epileptic patients (1990 - 1993, a total of 56 subjects, incl. 44 patients and relatives, partners and friends). The majority of patients are not only treated at the neurological department but are also psychiatric patients. The author mentions also excursions made with patients who attend the club and on two arts exhibitions of work made by the patients. He presents also results and discusses positive and negative of these tested forms of psychosocial work. The advantage of the programme for neuroses is the relatively intensive action. The advantage of the ambulatory group is the possibility to discuss in detail specific problems of patients with epilepsy. The club is acceptable for a much wider circle of patients than the other two forms. The author recommends a combination of the described three procedure and the application of the widest possible range of other rehabilitation methods.

摘要

提交的论文基于以下经验

  1. 在住院期间将癫痫患者纳入神经症患者项目(1968 - 1983年,共20名患者);2. 仅为癫痫患者设立的门诊心理治疗小组(1983 - 1989年,共41名受试者,即39名患者和2名患者的母亲);3. 一个癫痫患者俱乐部(1990 - 1993年,共56名受试者,包括44名患者及其亲属、伴侣和朋友)。大多数患者不仅在神经科接受治疗,还是精神科患者。作者还提到了与参加俱乐部的患者一起进行的远足活动,以及患者举办的两次艺术展览。他还展示了结果,并讨论了这些经过测试的心理社会工作形式的优缺点。神经症项目的优点是行动相对密集。门诊小组的优点是能够详细讨论癫痫患者的具体问题。俱乐部比其他两种形式更能被更广泛的患者群体接受。作者建议将上述三种方法结合起来,并尽可能广泛地应用其他康复方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验