• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿萨姆邦卡姆鲁普地区短跗司蛉(双翅目:蛾蠓科)对滴滴涕的抗性——司蛉属首次报道

D.D.T. resistance in Sergentomyia shorttii (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Kamrup, Assam--first report in Sergentomyia genus.

作者信息

Kaul S M, Sharma R S, Borgohain B K

机构信息

National Institute of Communicable Diseases, Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Commun Dis. 1994 Jun;26(2):100-2.

PMID:7989671
Abstract

S. shorttii, a common phlebotomine sandfly species of Assam, was tested for susceptibility to commonly used insecticides, D.D.T., malathion and Fenitrothion in Kamrup district, Assam. Tests carried out by WHO test kits showed 100 per cent mortalities against discriminating concentrations of malathion (5 per cent) and Fenitrothion (1 per cent). With D.D.T., in 1 hr. exposure mortalities recorded were 54.5 and 64.4 per cent, whereas in 24 hr. exposure mortalities were 75 per cent and 90 per cent. The area has been under continuous D.D.T. spraying since the beginning of NMEP in 1958, and high selection pressure appears to have precipitated D.D.T. resistance in this partly exophilic species.

摘要

短须白蛉是阿萨姆邦常见的吸血白蛉物种,在阿萨姆邦卡姆鲁普地区对其进行了常用杀虫剂滴滴涕、马拉硫磷和杀螟硫磷的敏感性测试。使用世卫组织测试试剂盒进行的测试表明,在马拉硫磷(5%)和杀螟硫磷(1%)的鉴别浓度下死亡率为100%。使用滴滴涕时,暴露1小时记录的死亡率分别为54.5%和64.4%,而暴露24小时的死亡率分别为75%和90%。自1958年全国疟疾根除计划开始以来,该地区一直在持续喷洒滴滴涕,高选择压力似乎促使这种部分嗜外性物种产生了滴滴涕抗性。

相似文献

1
D.D.T. resistance in Sergentomyia shorttii (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Kamrup, Assam--first report in Sergentomyia genus.阿萨姆邦卡姆鲁普地区短跗司蛉(双翅目:蛾蠓科)对滴滴涕的抗性——司蛉属首次报道
J Commun Dis. 1994 Jun;26(2):100-2.
2
Susceptibility status of Phlebotomus papatasi and Sergentomyia punjabaensis (Diptera:Psychodidae) to some insecticides in district Bikaner (Rajasthan).比卡内尔地区(拉贾斯坦邦)巴氏白蛉和旁遮普司蛉(双翅目:毛蠓科)对某些杀虫剂的敏感性状况
J Commun Dis. 1996 Mar;28(1):28-32.
3
Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles koliensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in northeastern Irian Jaya, Indonesia.印度尼西亚伊里安查亚东北部科氏按蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的杀虫剂敏感性状况
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1993 Jun;24(2):357-62.
4
Susceptibility of sand flies to selected insecticides in North Africa and the Middle East.北非和中东地区白蛉对选定杀虫剂的敏感性。
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2001 Mar;17(1):23-7.
5
[Evaluation of the sensitivity of Anopheles gambiae to fenitrothion, malathion and DDT in Senegal].[塞内加尔冈比亚按蚊对杀螟硫磷、马拉硫磷和滴滴涕的敏感性评估]
Dakar Med. 1991;36(2):170-7.
6
Susceptibility to DDT, malathion, fenitrothion and dieldrin of three flea species in the boyolali plague endemic area, Central Java, Indonesia.印度尼西亚中爪哇省博约拉利鼠疫流行区三种跳蚤对滴滴涕、马拉硫磷、杀螟硫磷和狄氏剂的敏感性
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1980 Mar;11(1):108-12.
7
Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles stephensi, Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti in Panaji, Goa.果阿邦帕纳吉市斯氏按蚊、致倦库蚊和埃及伊蚊的杀虫剂敏感性状况
Indian J Malariol. 1993 Jun;30(2):75-9.
8
Susceptibility to chemical insecticides of two Brazilian populations of the visceral leishmaniasis vector Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae).巴西两个内脏利什曼病传播媒介长须罗蛉(双翅目:毛蠓科)种群对化学杀虫剂的敏感性
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Oct;14(10):1272-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02371.x.
9
Insecticide susceptibility tests of Anopheles minimus s.l., Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus in northern Thailand.泰国北部微小按蚊复合组、埃及伊蚊、白纹伊蚊和致倦库蚊的杀虫剂敏感性测试。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003 Mar;34(1):87-93.
10
Susceptibility of the malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies (Diptera: Culicidae) to DDT, dieldrin, malathion, and lambda-cyhalothrin.疟疾媒介库氏按蚊(双翅目:蚊科)对滴滴涕、狄氏剂、马拉硫磷和氯氰菊酯的敏感性。
J Vector Ecol. 1999 Dec;24(2):187-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Baseline susceptibility of a wild strain of main vectors of leishmaniasis to WHO-recommended insecticides in southeastern Iran.伊朗东南部主要利什曼病传播媒介野生株对世行推荐杀虫剂的基础敏感性。
Parasit Vectors. 2022 Jan 31;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05154-5.