Bosl G J, Bajorin D F
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, and the Department of Medicine, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY.
Semin Oncol. 1994 Oct;21(5 Suppl 12):61-4.
Two hundred sixty-five evaluable patients were randomized to receive either carboplatin/etoposide (131 patients) or cisplatin/etoposide (134 patients). Among the carboplatin-treated patients, 115 (88%) achieved a complete remission, compared with 121 (90%) of patients receiving cisplatin. In the carboplatin group, however, 16 patients (12%) relapsed following complete remission, in contrast to four (3%) of those receiving cisplatin. Thus, the total number of unfavorable events (incomplete response + relapse) was 32 (24%) in the carboplatin arm, compared with 17 (13%) in the cisplatin arm (P = .02). In addition, patients receiving carboplatin had a greater likelihood of being hospitalized for neutropenia and fever (P = .016) and had lower platelet nadirs (P < .001). It was concluded that carboplatin administered at the dose and schedule used in this clinical trial resulted in an inferior event-free survival rate and worse toxicity than cisplatin, and is not recommended for use in general practice.
265例可评估患者被随机分为两组,分别接受卡铂/依托泊苷治疗(131例患者)和顺铂/依托泊苷治疗(134例患者)。在接受卡铂治疗的患者中,115例(88%)实现了完全缓解,而接受顺铂治疗的患者中有121例(90%)实现了完全缓解。然而,在卡铂组中,有16例患者(12%)在完全缓解后复发,相比之下,接受顺铂治疗的患者中只有4例(3%)复发。因此,卡铂组不良事件(未完全缓解+复发)的总数为32例(24%),而顺铂组为17例(13%)(P = 0.02)。此外,接受卡铂治疗的患者因中性粒细胞减少和发热住院的可能性更大(P = 0.016),且血小板最低点更低(P < 0.001)。研究得出结论,在本临床试验中使用的剂量和疗程下,卡铂导致的无事件生存率低于顺铂,毒性也更差,不建议在一般临床实践中使用。