Yapko M D
Am J Clin Hypn. 1994 Jan;36(3):163-71; discussion 172-87. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1994.10403066.
The mental health field is deeply divided in its views regarding the possibility of creating false memories of sexual abuse through suggestive procedures. Psychotherapists in clinical practice were surveyed regarding their views on memory and hypnosis in order to assess how their perspectives might influence their clinical methods. Survey data regarding hypnosis and suggestibility indicate that while psychotherapists largely view hypnosis favorably, they often do so on the basis of misinformation. A significant number of psychotherapists erroneously believe, for example, that memories obtained through hypnosis are more likely to be accurate than those simply recalled, and that hypnosis can be used to recover accurate memories even from as far back as birth. Such misinformed views can lead to misapplications of hypnosis when attempting to actively recover memories of presumably repressed episodes of abuse, possibly resulting in the recovery of suggested rather than actual memories.
心理健康领域在通过暗示性程序制造性虐待虚假记忆的可能性问题上存在严重分歧。为了评估临床实践中的心理治疗师对记忆和催眠的看法会如何影响他们的临床方法,对他们进行了调查。有关催眠和暗示性的调查数据表明,虽然心理治疗师大多对催眠持赞许态度,但他们这样做往往是基于错误信息。例如,相当多的心理治疗师错误地认为,通过催眠获得的记忆比单纯回忆的记忆更有可能准确,而且催眠甚至可以用来找回早在出生时的准确记忆。这种错误认知的观点在试图积极找回据称被压抑的虐待事件记忆时,可能会导致催眠的误用,从而可能找回的是暗示性记忆而非实际记忆。