Loftus Elizabeth F, Davis Deborah
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-7085, USA.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:469-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095315.
The issues surrounding repressed, recovered, or false memories have sparked one of the greatest controversies in the mental health profession in the twentieth century. We review evidence concerning the existence of the repression and recovery of autobiographical memories of traumatic events and research on the development of false autobiographical memories, how specific therapeutic procedures can lead to false memories, and individual vulnerability to resisting false memories. These findings have implications for therapeutic practice, for forensic practice, for research and training in psychology, and for public policy.
围绕被压抑、恢复或虚假记忆的问题引发了20世纪心理健康专业领域最大的争议之一。我们回顾了关于创伤事件自传体记忆的压抑与恢复的存在证据,以及关于虚假自传体记忆形成、特定治疗程序如何导致虚假记忆,以及个体抵抗虚假记忆的易感性的研究。这些研究结果对治疗实践、法医实践、心理学研究与培训以及公共政策都具有启示意义。