Heron J F, Goedhals L, Jordaan J P, Cunningham J, Cedar E
Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Ann Oncol. 1994 Sep;5(7):579-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058927.
Three anti-emetic treatment regimens were compared in 357 patients receiving cisplatin therapy (mean dose 81 mg/m2) in this double-blind randomized study. Regimens studied were i) granisetron 1 mg bd orally for 7 days (granisetron alone); ii) gran 1 mg bd orally for 7 days plus prophylactic dexamethasone (12 mg i.v.) on the first day only (gran/dex); iii) metoclopramide (3 mg/kg i.v. loading dose; 4 mg/kg i.v. infusion) plus dex (12 mg i.v.) on the first day followed by met 10 mg orally tds for a further 6 days (met/dex).
At 24 hours, gran/dex was significantly superior to met/dex in terms of total anti-emetic control, defined as no nausea, no vomiting, no rescue anti-emetic therapy, not withdrawn (54.7% gran/dex vs. 37.2% met/dex; P < 0.01). There was also a significant delay in time to onset of nausea (P < 0.01) and vomiting (P < 0.01) following gran/dex compared with met/dex. Oral granisetron alone was as effective as met/dex in control of acute emesis in all parameters examined. There were no significant differences between the three groups in the control of delayed nausea and vomiting. The most common adverse experiences in both granisetron groups were headache and constipation, both characteristic of 5-HT3 antagonists. Agitation, somnolence, diarrhoea and decreased appetite were reported more frequently by the met/dex group.
Oral granisetron as a single agent is as effective as high doses of i.v. met/dex in preventing cisplatin-induced emesis. Oral granisetron in combination with a corticosteroid provides superior anti-emetic control to the met/dex regimen in patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
在这项双盲随机研究中,对357例接受顺铂治疗(平均剂量81mg/m²)的患者比较了三种止吐治疗方案。研究的方案为:i)格拉司琼1mg,每日2次口服,共7天(单用格拉司琼);ii)格拉司琼1mg,每日2次口服,共7天,且仅在第1天加用预防性地塞米松(静脉注射12mg)(格拉司琼/地塞米松);iii)甲氧氯普胺(静脉注射负荷剂量3mg/kg;静脉输注4mg/kg)加地塞米松(静脉注射12mg),在第1天给药,随后甲氧氯普胺10mg,每日3次口服,持续6天(甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松)。
在24小时时,格拉司琼/地塞米松在完全止吐控制方面显著优于甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松,完全止吐控制定义为无恶心、无呕吐、无需急救止吐治疗、未退出研究(格拉司琼/地塞米松为54.7%,甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松为37.2%;P<0.01)。与甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松相比,格拉司琼/地塞米松组出现恶心(P<0.01)和呕吐(P<0.01)的时间也显著延迟。单用口服格拉司琼在所有检查参数中对急性呕吐的控制效果与甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松相当。三组在延迟性恶心和呕吐的控制方面无显著差异。两个格拉司琼组最常见的不良事件是头痛和便秘,这两者都是5-HT3拮抗剂的特征性表现。甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松组报告的激动、嗜睡、腹泻和食欲减退更为频繁。
口服格拉司琼作为单一药物在预防顺铂引起的呕吐方面与高剂量静脉注射甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松效果相当。在接受高致吐性化疗的患者中,口服格拉司琼联合皮质类固醇提供了比甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松方案更好的止吐控制。