Naito S, Ueda T, Kotoh S, Iguchi A, Sagiyama K, Hiratsuka Y, Osada Y, Ariyoshi A, Omoto T, Kumazawa J
Department of Surgery, Saga Medical School, Japan.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;35 Suppl:S76-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00686925.
A prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare the prophylactic effect of intravesical installation of Adriamycin (ADM) plus verapamil (VR) with that of ADM alone for recurrence of superficial bladder cancer. A total of 226 patients were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups. Group A received intravesical instillation of ADM (30 mg/30 ml physiological saline) on 19 occasions during a 1-year period after transurethral resection, whereas group B received intravesical instillation of ADM (30 mg/24 ml physiological saline) plus VR (15 mg/6 ml saline) according to the same schedule used for group A. Evaluation was possible in 157 of the 226 registered patients (group A, 76; group B, 81). There was no significant difference in the patients' characteristics between the two groups, and there was no significant difference in the overall nonrecurrence rate determined over a 24-month follow-up period. However, group B showed a significantly higher nonrecurrence rate than did group A for tumors measuring less than 1 cm in diameter (P < 0.05) and for histological grade 2 tumors (P < 0.01) in spite of there being no significant difference in the other characteristics of each subgroup of patients. The incidence and severity of side effects were similar in both groups, and VR caused no significant systemic toxicity. Although further follow-up is necessary, these results suggest that intravesical instillation of ADM plus VR is clinically safe and may be more effective than instillation of ADM alone in preventing the postoperative recurrence of superficial bladder cancer (less than 1 cm in diameter, histological grade 2).
进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较膀胱内灌注阿霉素(ADM)加维拉帕米(VR)与单独使用ADM预防浅表性膀胱癌复发的效果。共纳入226例患者并随机分为2组。A组在经尿道切除术后1年内19次膀胱内灌注ADM(30 mg/30 ml生理盐水),而B组按照A组相同的方案膀胱内灌注ADM(30 mg/24 ml生理盐水)加VR(15 mg/6 ml生理盐水)。226例登记患者中有157例(A组76例,B组81例)可进行评估。两组患者的特征无显著差异,在24个月的随访期内总体无复发率也无显著差异。然而,尽管各亚组患者的其他特征无显著差异,但B组直径小于1 cm的肿瘤和组织学2级肿瘤的无复发率显著高于A组(P < 0.05和P < 0.01)。两组副作用的发生率和严重程度相似,且VR未引起明显的全身毒性。尽管需要进一步随访,但这些结果表明,膀胱内灌注ADM加VR在临床上是安全的,在预防浅表性膀胱癌(直径小于1 cm,组织学2级)术后复发方面可能比单独灌注ADM更有效。