• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赖诺普利与硝苯地平治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。一项多中心研究。

A comparison of lisinopril and nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. A multicentre study.

作者信息

Rogstad B

机构信息

Medical Department, Buskerud Central Hospital, Drammen, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;46(6):487-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00196102.

DOI:10.1007/BF00196102
PMID:7995312
Abstract

Lisinopril has been compared with slow-release nifedipine in a 16-week double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study involving 102 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced 6 and 5 mmHg more by lisinopril than by nifedipine over 12 weeks monotherapy. After 12 weeks a greater proportion of patients taking lisinopril was controlled (sitting diastolic blood pressure below 95 mm Hg) than in those taking nifedipine. As a result, 17% of those taking lisinopril and 38% of those taking nifedipine required additional therapy with hydrochlorothiazide. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide resulted in similar response rates in the lisinopril and nifedipine groups (89% and 75% respectively). The rate of reporting of adverse events considered to be drug-related and the rate of withdrawals were similar for both treatments. Cough was more often reported with lisinopril and headache, sweating, and hot flushes with nifedipine. We conclude that once-daily titrated doses of lisinopril produced better control of blood pressure than twice-daily titrated doses of nifedipine.

摘要

在一项为期16周的双盲、随机、平行组研究中,将赖诺普利与缓释硝苯地平进行了比较,该研究纳入了102例轻度至中度高血压患者。在12周的单药治疗中,赖诺普利使坐位收缩压和舒张压分别比硝苯地平多降低6 mmHg和5 mmHg。12周后,服用赖诺普利的患者中血压得到控制(坐位舒张压低于95 mmHg)的比例高于服用硝苯地平的患者。结果,服用赖诺普利的患者中有17%、服用硝苯地平的患者中有38%需要加用氢氯噻嗪进行额外治疗。加用氢氯噻嗪后,赖诺普利组和硝苯地平组的反应率相似(分别为89%和75%)。两种治疗的药物相关不良事件报告率和停药率相似。服用赖诺普利时咳嗽的报告更为常见,而服用硝苯地平时头痛、出汗和潮热的报告更为常见。我们得出结论,每日一次滴定剂量的赖诺普利比每日两次滴定剂量的硝苯地平能更好地控制血压。

相似文献

1
A comparison of lisinopril and nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. A multicentre study.赖诺普利与硝苯地平治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。一项多中心研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;46(6):487-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00196102.
2
Lisinopril versus slow-release nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a multicentre study. The Cooperative Study Group.赖诺普利与缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度高血压的多中心研究。协作研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:29-33.
3
ACE inhibition versus calcium antagonism in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a multicentre study. Ireland-Netherlands Lisinopril-Nifedipine Study Group.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与钙拮抗剂治疗轻至中度高血压的比较:一项多中心研究。爱尔兰-荷兰赖诺普利-硝苯地平研究组
Postgrad Med J. 1993 Jun;69(812):450-5. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.812.450.
4
Greater reduction of urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive type II diabetic patients with incipient nephropathy by lisinopril than by nifedipine.赖诺普利比硝苯地平能更有效地降低患有早期肾病的高血压II型糖尿病患者的尿白蛋白排泄量。
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Mar;10(3):185-92.
5
Lisinopril versus slow release nifedipine in patients with essential hypertension: a multicentre study.赖诺普利与缓释硝苯地平治疗原发性高血压患者的多中心研究
J Hum Hypertens. 1994 Oct;8(10):777-80.
6
Oral combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril vs nifedipine for postpartum hypertension: a comparative-effectiveness pilot randomized controlled trial.口服氢氯噻嗪与赖诺普利联合用药与硝苯地平治疗产后高血压的比较有效性初步随机对照试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5):571.e1-571.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
7
Reduction of left ventricular mass by lisinopril and nifedipine in hypertensive renal transplant recipients: a prospective randomized double-blind study.赖诺普利和硝苯地平对高血压肾移植受者左心室质量的降低作用:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
Transplantation. 2001 Jul 15;72(1):107-11. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200107150-00021.
8
Comparisons of long-term effects of lisinopril vs nifedipine vs conventional therapy in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.赖诺普利、硝苯地平与传统疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者轻至中度高血压的长期效果比较。
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1996 Jun;57(6):392-400.
9
Efficacy of nifedipine or lisinopril in the treatment of hypertension after renal transplantation: a double-blind randomised comparative trial.硝苯地平或赖诺普利治疗肾移植后高血压的疗效:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Clin Transplant. 2001 Dec;15(6):426-31. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.150611.x.
10
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced cough compared with placebo, and other antihypertensives: A systematic review, and network meta-analysis.血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂引起的咳嗽与安慰剂和其他抗高血压药物的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2023 Aug;25(8):661-688. doi: 10.1111/jch.14695. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). Evaluation of pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties.硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)。药物、药代动力学和药理学特性评估。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Jan;30(1):28-51. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199630010-00003.

本文引用的文献

1
Lisinopril versus slow-release nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a multicentre study. The Cooperative Study Group.赖诺普利与缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度高血压的多中心研究。协作研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:29-33.
2
Comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to severe essential hypertension.赖诺普利与硝苯地平治疗轻至重度原发性高血压的对比试验。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9 Suppl 3:S49-52.
3
Lisinopril or nifedipine in essential hypertension? A Norwegian multicenter study on efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in 828 patients.
赖诺普利与硝苯地平治疗原发性高血压?一项针对828例患者的疗效、耐受性及生活质量的挪威多中心研究。
J Hypertens. 1991 Dec;9(12):1097-104.