Mörlin C, Baglivo H, Boeijinga J K, Breckenridge A M, Clement D, Johnston G D, Klein W, Kramer R, Luccioni R, Meurer K A
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9 Suppl 3:S49-52.
A total of 136 patients with mild to severe uncomplicated essential hypertension were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-placebo, parallel study to compare the effect of lisinopril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, with that of nifedipine. Following a 2-week placebo control period the patients were treated with either 20-80 mg/day of lisinopril (n = 89) or with 40-80 mg/day of nifedipine (n = 47). Blood pressure was significantly reduced in both groups after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. There was no difference in the effect of lisinopril compared to nifedipine. No serious clinical or laboratory adverse experiences were observed during the study. The incidence of clinical side effects was significantly lower in the lisinopril group than in the nifedipine group (21.3 vs. 48.9%, p less than or equal to 0.01). There were no significant changes in laboratory data in either group. The results indicate that lisinopril is as effective as nifedipine in the treatment of uncomplicated essential hypertension and that lisinopril is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile.
在一项多中心、随机、双盲、双安慰剂、平行研究中,对136例轻至重度无并发症的原发性高血压患者进行了评估,以比较新型血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利与硝苯地平的疗效。在为期2周的安慰剂对照期后,患者分别接受20 - 80毫克/天的赖诺普利治疗(n = 89)或40 - 80毫克/天的硝苯地平治疗(n = 47)。治疗4周、8周和12周后,两组血压均显著降低。赖诺普利与硝苯地平的疗效无差异。研究期间未观察到严重的临床或实验室不良事件。赖诺普利组临床副作用的发生率显著低于硝苯地平组(21.3%对48.9%,p≤0.01)。两组实验室数据均无显著变化。结果表明,赖诺普利在治疗无并发症的原发性高血压方面与硝苯地平同样有效,且耐受性良好,安全性可接受。