Suppr超能文献

两种粘结剂在正常和污染条件下与牙釉质和牙本质的体外粘结强度。

In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions.

作者信息

Xie J, Powers J M, McGuckin R S

机构信息

Department of Oral Biomaterials, University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Dental Branch.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 1993 Sep;9(5):295-9. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-s.

Abstract

In vitro bond strengths of human enamel and dentin treated with five contaminants were measured with air, water and damp conditions as controls. Two commercial bonding agents (a lower-viscosity, solvent-containing type, AB, and a higher-viscosity, hydrophilic monomer type, SB) and their composites were applied to tooth structure under two conditions (contaminated and re-etched). Samples were debonded in tension after 24 h using an inverted, truncated cone test. Among the controls, the highest bond strengths were obtained with damp conditions for AB (24 MPa) and damp conditions or air for SB (22 MPa) with small differences between enamel and dentin. Most contaminants lowered the bond strength. Re-etching without additional mechanical preparation resulted in bond strengths similar to controls. Bond strengths to tooth structure with the bonding agents tested may be less sensitive to common forms of contamination than typically assumed.

摘要

在空气、水和潮湿条件作为对照的情况下,测量了用五种污染物处理过的人牙釉质和牙本质的体外粘结强度。两种市售粘结剂(一种低粘度、含溶剂型,AB,和一种高粘度、亲水性单体型,SB)及其复合材料在两种条件下(污染和再蚀刻)应用于牙齿结构。24小时后,使用倒置截顶圆锥试验对样品进行拉伸脱粘。在对照中,AB在潮湿条件下(24MPa)以及SB在潮湿条件或空气条件下(22MPa)获得了最高粘结强度,牙釉质和牙本质之间差异较小。大多数污染物降低了粘结强度。无需额外机械制备的再蚀刻导致粘结强度与对照相似。所测试的粘结剂与牙齿结构的粘结强度可能比通常认为的对常见污染形式不太敏感。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验