Can the electrophysiologic study predict treatment outcome in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias unrelated to coronary artery disease?

UNLABELLED

Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias unrelated to coronary artery disease are uncommon. Currently there are no clear guidelines to aid selection of the most appropriate treatment strategy. Therefore, factors potentially predictive of arrhythmia recurrence and death and the ability of the electrophysiologic study to predict treatment outcome in patients with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias unrelated to coronary artery disease were examined in 41 medically treated patients followed for a median of 25 (range 1-76) months. Examined factors were: syncope associated with the spontaneous arrhythmia, the morphology and cycle length of the presenting arrhythmia, underlying ventricular function, cardiac pathology, and the results of drug assessment at electrophysiologic study. Random variability in the ease of arrhythmia induction at electrophysiologic study was measured for the group as a whole and was allowed for in prediction of an effective drug response. The 95% confidence intervals for variability in the ease of repeat arrhythmia induction at the same study were < or = 1 extrastimulus and for variability in the ease of repeat arrhythmia inductions at different studies were < or = 2 extrastimuli. Poisson regression models were used for data analysis. Arrhythmia recurrence was most likely in: (1) patients on treatment not predicted to be anti-arrhythmic at electrophysiologic study; (2) patients whose treatment was not assessable at electrophysiologic study because the arrhythmia was not reliably inducible; (3) patients with impaired ventricular function; and (4) re-entered patients whose arrhythmia had recurred on previously allocated therapy. The risk of arrhythmia recurrence decreased with time from hospital assessment. All five deaths occurred in patients with impaired ventricular function.

CONCLUSIONS

drug efficacy should be tested at electrophysiologic study in patients with reproducibly inducible clinical arrhythmias. Treatment not proven to be anti-arrhythmic at electrophysiologic study is usually ineffective. Patients with ventricular dysfunction are at highest risk of death from arrhythmia recurrence and should be considered for an implantable defibrillator, arrhythmia surgery, or heart transplantation if drug treatment is not predicted to be effective or is not assessable at electrophysiologic study.