Apfeldorf M, Hunley P J
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401.
Int J Addict. 1994 Aug;29(10):1347-60. doi: 10.3109/10826089409047947.
Four groups of domiciliary residents were studied with the Institutionalized Chronic Alcoholic Scale (ICAS) and MacAndrew Scale (MAC) to determine the more effective indirect alcoholism scale. The groups included: (a) 48 alcoholics, (b) 27 residents with alcoholism and other psychiatric diagnoses, (c) 24 residents with psychiatric diagnoses only, and (d) 22 with only medical diagnoses. MacAndrew had omitted two alcohol usage items from the 51 item MAC in order to develop a more effective indirect scale, free of alcohol usage items. A similar omission technique was employed with the ICAS in the current study. ANOVA indicated that the MAC was the more effective indirect scale.
研究人员使用机构化慢性酒精中毒量表（ICAS）和麦克安德鲁量表（MAC）对四组居家居民进行了研究，以确定更有效的间接酒精中毒量表。这些组包括：（a）48名酗酒者，（b）27名患有酒精中毒和其他精神疾病诊断的居民，（c）24名仅患有精神疾病诊断的居民，以及（d）22名仅患有医学诊断的居民。为了开发一个更有效的、不含饮酒项目的间接量表，麦克安德鲁从51项的MAC中省略了两项饮酒项目。在本研究中，对ICAS采用了类似的省略技术。方差分析表明，MAC是更有效的间接量表。
