Suppr超能文献

比较作为间接酒精中毒量表的ICAS和MAC:方法学考量及对进一步研究的启示

Comparing the ICAS and the MAC as Indirect Alcoholism Scales: methodological considerations and implications for further research.

作者信息

Apfeldorf M, Hunley P J

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401.

出版信息

Int J Addict. 1994 Aug;29(10):1347-60. doi: 10.3109/10826089409047947.

Abstract

Four groups of domiciliary residents were studied with the Institutionalized Chronic Alcoholic Scale (ICAS) and MacAndrew Scale (MAC) to determine the more effective indirect alcoholism scale. The groups included: (a) 48 alcoholics, (b) 27 residents with alcoholism and other psychiatric diagnoses, (c) 24 residents with psychiatric diagnoses only, and (d) 22 with only medical diagnoses. MacAndrew had omitted two alcohol usage items from the 51 item MAC in order to develop a more effective indirect scale, free of alcohol usage items. A similar omission technique was employed with the ICAS in the current study. ANOVA indicated that the MAC was the more effective indirect scale.

摘要

研究人员使用机构化慢性酒精中毒量表(ICAS)和麦克安德鲁量表(MAC)对四组居家居民进行了研究,以确定更有效的间接酒精中毒量表。这些组包括:(a)48名酗酒者,(b)27名患有酒精中毒和其他精神疾病诊断的居民,(c)24名仅患有精神疾病诊断的居民,以及(d)22名仅患有医学诊断的居民。为了开发一个更有效的、不含饮酒项目的间接量表,麦克安德鲁从51项的MAC中省略了两项饮酒项目。在本研究中,对ICAS采用了类似的省略技术。方差分析表明,MAC是更有效的间接量表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验