• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
First trimester prenatal diagnosis: earlier is not necessarily better.孕早期产前诊断:并非越早越好。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):146-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.146.
2
Advances in prenatal diagnosis. Social-psychological and policy issues.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(4):601-17. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008485.
3
Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis.
Lancet. 1997 Mar 8;349(9053):711-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08169-X.
4
Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling.双胎妊娠的产前诊断:孕中期羊膜腔穿刺术与孕早期绒毛取样的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;82(1):49-56.
5
The role of physician preferences in the choice of amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal genetic testing.医生偏好对产前基因检测选择羊膜穿刺术或绒毛取样的作用。
Genet Test. 1998;2(1):61-6. doi: 10.1089/gte.1998.2.61.
6
[Prenatal diagnosis using chorionic villi].[使用绒毛膜绒毛进行产前诊断]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1991 Jul;59:211-24.
7
The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities.绒毛取样用于细胞遗传学异常早期产前诊断的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 9;320(10):609-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903093201001.
8
Prenatal diagnosis and female abortion: a case study in medical law and ethics.产前诊断与女性堕胎:医学法律与伦理的一个案例研究
J Med Ethics. 1986 Sep;12(3):143-4, 150. doi: 10.1136/jme.12.3.143.
9
Chorionic villus sampling. Evaluating safety and efficacy.
Lancet. 1985 Mar 30;1(8431):737-40. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91272-3.
10
Attitudes about abortion of women who undergo prenatal diagnosis.接受产前诊断的女性对堕胎的态度。
Res Sociol Health Care. 1991;9:49-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Controlling Sickle Cell Disease in Ghana--ethics and options.加纳镰状细胞病的防控——伦理与选择
Pan Afr Med J. 2011;10:14. doi: 10.4314/pamj.v10i0.72223. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
2
Antenatal screening and its possible meaning from unborn baby's perspective.产前筛查及其从未出生婴儿角度看可能具有的意义。
BMC Med Ethics. 2001;2:E3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-2-3. Epub 2001 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Pregnancy termination for genetic indications: the impact on families.因遗传指征而终止妊娠:对家庭的影响。
Soc Work Health Care. 1984 Fall;10(1):17-34. doi: 10.1300/J010v10n01_02.
2
Ethics and trends in applied human genetics.
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1983;19(5):143-58.
3
Parental decision following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormality.胎儿染色体异常产前诊断后的父母决策。
Am J Med Genet. 1988 Mar;29(3):613-22. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320290320.
4
The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities.绒毛取样用于细胞遗传学异常早期产前诊断的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 9;320(10):609-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903093201001.
5
Genetic diagnosis in the first trimester: the norm for the 1990s.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jun;160(6):1332-6; discussion 1336-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90852-1.
6
Invasive fetal procedures.侵入性胎儿手术
Radiol Clin North Am. 1990 Jan;28(1):217-26.
7
Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: an association with poor perinatal outcome.绒毛取样中的嵌合体:与围产期不良结局的关联。
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Apr;75(4):573-7.
8
Prenatal screening and diagnosis: some psychological and social issues.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Dec;97(12):1074-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02492.x.
9
Malformations and minor anomalies in children whose mothers had prenatal diagnosis: comparison between CVS and amniocentesis.
Am J Med Genet. 1990 Nov;37(3):366-70. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320370315.
10
Incidence and timing of pregnancy losses: relevance to evaluating safety of early prenatal diagnosis.
Am J Med Genet. 1990 Feb;35(2):165-73. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320350205.

孕早期产前诊断:并非越早越好。

First trimester prenatal diagnosis: earlier is not necessarily better.

作者信息

Boss J A

机构信息

Department of the University of Rhode Island, Kingston.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):146-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.146.

DOI:10.1136/jme.20.3.146
PMID:7996559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1376499/
Abstract

In the past few years considerable attention has been given to a relatively new method of prenatal diagnosis known as chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Because CVS can be performed in the first trimester it is hailed by many as a significant advance over amniocentesis. What has not been as publicized, however, are the disadvantages of CVS and earlier prenatal diagnosis. The emotional costs of CVS in terms of the greater number of both spontaneous and selective abortions following CVS, the use of CVS for sex selection and, because of the greater social acceptability of first trimester abortion, the possibility of increased pressure on women to undergo prenatal diagnosis by health insurance companies, medical professionals and government agencies, all need to be weighed against the advantages of early prenatal diagnosis.

摘要

在过去几年里,一种相对较新的产前诊断方法——绒毛取样(CVS)受到了相当多的关注。由于绒毛取样可以在孕早期进行,许多人称赞它是比羊膜穿刺术的一项重大进步。然而,绒毛取样和早期产前诊断的缺点却没有得到同样的宣传。绒毛取样在情感方面的代价包括取样后自然流产和选择性流产数量的增加、将绒毛取样用于性别选择,以及由于孕早期流产在社会上更容易被接受,健康保险公司、医疗专业人员和政府机构可能会加大对女性进行产前诊断的压力,所有这些都需要与早期产前诊断的优势进行权衡。