• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在临床试验中测试基线平衡。

Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials.

作者信息

Senn S

机构信息

Medicine and Clinical Development Department, CIBA, Basle, Switzerland.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1994 Sep 15;13(17):1715-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131703.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780131703
PMID:7997705
Abstract

Once the data from a clinical trial are available for analysis it is common practice to carry out 'tests of baseline homogeneity' on prognostic covariates before proceeding to analyse the effects of treatment on outcome variables. It is argued that this practice is philosophically unsound, of no practical value and potentially misleading. Instead it is recommended that prognostic variables be identified in the trial-plan and fitted in an analysis of covariance regardless of their baseline distribution (statistical significance).

摘要

一旦来自临床试验的数据可供分析,在着手分析治疗对结局变量的影响之前,对预后协变量进行“基线同质性检验”是常见的做法。有人认为这种做法在理论上站不住脚,没有实际价值,而且可能会产生误导。相反,建议在试验计划中确定预后变量,并在协方差分析中进行拟合,而不考虑其基线分布(统计显著性)。

相似文献

1
Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials.在临床试验中测试基线平衡。
Stat Med. 1994 Sep 15;13(17):1715-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131703.
2
Sample size calculation and blinded recalculation for analysis of covariance models with multiple random covariates.协方差分析模型中多个随机协变量的样本量计算和双盲重算。
J Biopharm Stat. 2020;30(1):143-159. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1632871. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
3
How to select covariates to include in the analysis of a clinical trial.如何选择用于临床试验分析的协变量。
Control Clin Trials. 2000 Aug;21(4):330-42. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00061-1.
4
Primer: the fallacy of subgroup analysis.入门知识:亚组分析的谬误
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007 Jul;3(7):407-13. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0528.
5
Statistical power for analyses of changes in randomized controlled trials.随机对照试验中变化分析的统计功效。
J Dent Res. 2005 Mar;84(3):283-7. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400315.
6
Clinical trial design for orthodontists.正畸医生的临床试验设计
J Orthod. 2013 Jun;40(2):93-103. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000048.
7
Sample size calculations in randomized trials: common pitfalls.随机试验中的样本量计算:常见陷阱
Can J Anaesth. 2007 Feb;54(2):103-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03022005.
8
Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.应用于随机对照试验中出现的有序尺度数据的协方差分析的稳健性和功效。
Stat Med. 2003 Apr 30;22(8):1317-34. doi: 10.1002/sim.1433.
9
Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials.随机对照试验的样本量计算
Epidemiol Rev. 2002;24(1):39-53. doi: 10.1093/epirev/24.1.39.
10
Analysis of covariance in randomized trials: More precision and valid confidence intervals, without model assumptions.随机试验中的协方差分析:更高的精度和有效的置信区间,无需模型假设。
Biometrics. 2019 Dec;75(4):1391-1400. doi: 10.1111/biom.13062. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting smoking cessation and preventing relapse to tobacco use following a smoke-free mental health inpatient stay (SCEPTRE feasibility study): a multicentre randomised controlled feasibility study protocol.促进戒烟并防止无烟心理健康住院治疗后复吸烟草(SCEPTRE可行性研究):一项多中心随机对照可行性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e094441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094441.
2
Recommendations for a Complete Reporting of Statistical Methods in Veterinary Pharmacology.兽医药理学统计方法完整报告的建议。
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jul;48(4):221-233. doi: 10.1111/jvp.70001. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
3
Evaluation of the Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health of Parents With Children and Adolescents With a Rare Disease Based on the Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate a Family-Based Intervention and an Online Intervention for Affected Families (CARE-FAM-NET).
基于一项随机对照试验(CARE-FAM-NET)的结果,对患有罕见疾病的儿童和青少年的父母的健康相关生活质量和心理健康进行评估,该试验旨在研究针对受影响家庭的家庭干预和在线干预。
Fam Process. 2025 Jun;64(2):e70041. doi: 10.1111/famp.70041.
4
Investigation of Risk Factors and Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Breast-Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.乳腺浸润性小叶癌总生存预测的危险因素调查及列线图的构建与验证
Breast Care (Basel). 2025 Apr;20(2):118-131. doi: 10.1159/000543865. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
5
Significance Testing for Differences Between Baseline Variables Versus the I2 Test in Detecting Selection Bias in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Simulation Study.在随机对照试验中检测选择偏倚时,比较基线变量差异的显著性检验与I²检验:一项模拟研究
Cureus. 2024 Dec 30;16(12):e76607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76607. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Treatment expectations and pain-related outcomes in clinical trials of digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth with chronic pain.针对患有慢性疼痛的青少年的数字认知行为疗法临床试验中的治疗期望和疼痛相关结果。
J Pain. 2025 Mar;28:104791. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.104791. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
7
The Effect of Bio-Electromagnetic Energy Regulation Therapy on Erectile Dysfunction in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.生物电磁能量调节疗法对多发性硬化症患者勃起功能障碍的影响:一项三盲随机临床试验
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 22;13(23):7060. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237060.
8
Slowing Cognitive Decline in Major Depressive Disorder and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.减缓重度抑郁症和轻度认知障碍患者的认知衰退:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 1;82(1):12-21. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3241.
9
When does adjusting covariate under randomization help? A comparative study on current practices.随机化时调整协变量有何帮助?对现行实践的比较研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02375-3.
10
Statistical analysis plan for the SOLUTIONS randomised controlled trial with internal pilot: Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) in 10-17-year-olds presenting at policy custody.SOLUTIONS 随机对照试验的统计分析计划,带有内部试点:在政策拘留所出现的 10-17 岁青少年中采用解决方案聚焦式短期治疗(SFBT)。
Trials. 2024 Sep 28;25(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08457-3.