• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异食癖和食物抢夺行为治疗中的辨别训练。

Discrimination training in the treatment of pica and food scavenging.

作者信息

Johnson C R, Hunt F M, Siebert M J

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

出版信息

Behav Modif. 1994 Apr;18(2):214-29. doi: 10.1177/01454455940182005.

DOI:10.1177/01454455940182005
PMID:8002926
Abstract

Pica and scavenging are serious, sometimes life-threatening behavior problems among a significant percentage of individuals with mental retardation. This study describes procedures developed to reduce life-threatening pica and food scavenging in two adolescents with severe to profound mental retardation. Treatment was designed to teach the subjects to discriminate safe from unsafe items by training them to ingest only those items put on a specified placemat and to communicate with simple signs or gestures to obtain more food to be put on the mat. Discrimination was achieved by praising subjects when they selected and ingested items from their placemats and delivering a mild punisher when attempts to ingest nonplacemat items were made. A multiple baseline design across settings was used to evaluate the effects of the treatment package in three inpatient settings. All environments were "baited" with both edible and inedible items. Our treatment procedures appeared to be effective in reducing pica in each of the settings. Generalization of treatment effects to natural environments for one of the two subjects was documented.

摘要

异食癖和捡食行为是相当一部分智力障碍者中存在的严重、有时甚至危及生命的行为问题。本研究描述了为减少两名重度至极重度智力障碍青少年危及生命的异食癖和食物捡食行为而制定的程序。治疗旨在通过训练受试者只摄取放在特定餐垫上的物品,并通过简单的手势或姿势进行沟通以获取更多放在餐垫上的食物,来教会他们区分安全与不安全的物品。当受试者从餐垫上选择并摄取物品时给予表扬,而当他们试图摄取非餐垫上的物品时给予轻微惩罚,以此实现辨别。采用跨环境的多基线设计来评估该治疗方案在三个住院环境中的效果。所有环境中都放置了可食用和不可食用的物品。我们的治疗程序似乎在每个环境中都有效地减少了异食癖。记录了其中一名受试者的治疗效果向自然环境的泛化情况。

相似文献

1
Discrimination training in the treatment of pica and food scavenging.异食癖和食物抢夺行为治疗中的辨别训练。
Behav Modif. 1994 Apr;18(2):214-29. doi: 10.1177/01454455940182005.
2
A preliminary evaluation of empirically derived consequences for the treatment of pica.对异食癖治疗的经验性推导结果的初步评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):447-57. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-447.
3
Reducing pica by teaching children to exchange inedible items for edibles.通过教孩子们用不可食用的物品换取可食用的物品来减少异食癖。
Behav Modif. 2006 Mar;30(2):135-58. doi: 10.1177/0145445505283414.
4
The use of negative practice for the control of pica behavior.运用消极练习法控制异食癖行为。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;24(3):249-53. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(93)90028-u.
5
A demonstration of generalization of performance across settings, materials, and motor responses for students with profound mental retardation.对重度智力障碍学生在不同场景、材料和运动反应方面表现泛化的一项展示。
Behav Modif. 1995 Jan;19(1):119-43. doi: 10.1177/01454455950191007.
6
Overcorrection of pica in two profoundly retarded adults: analysis of setting effects, stimulus, and response generalization.两名重度智障成年人异食癖的过度矫正:情境效应、刺激及反应泛化分析
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1980;1(3-4):241-52. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(80)90007-7.
7
Effects of a screening procedure on pica and collateral behaviors.一种筛查程序对异食癖及相关行为的影响。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1984 Mar;15(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(84)90124-1.
8
Identifying empirically supported treatments for pica in individuals with intellectual disabilities.确定具有智力障碍个体异食癖的循证治疗方法。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.042. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
9
Pica in persons with developmental disabilities: approaches to treatment.发育障碍者的异食癖:治疗方法。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Sep;34(9):2564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.018. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
10
Functional analysis and treatment of cigarette pica.食纸癖的功能分析与治疗
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):437-49; quiz 449-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-437.