Herron L
Central Coast Spine Institute, San Luis Obispo, California 93405.
J Spinal Disord. 1994 Apr;7(2):161-6. doi: 10.1097/00002517-199407020-00010.
Forty-six patients who had previously undergone laminectomy and discectomy for lumbar disc herniation were treated for recurrent disc herniation by repeat laminectomy and discectomy. Fifty recurrences were treated in 46 patients, an average of 7 years and 1 month after the previous laminectomy (range 3 months-22 years and 11 months). Thirty-four patients were treated for 37 recurrences at the same level, with three undergoing a third laminectomy and discectomy. Twelve patients were treated for 13 recurrences at a different level. Four patients underwent a third laminectomy and discectomy for recurrent disc herniation. Forty-one patients had follow-up of at least 1 year and average follow-up was 4 years and 6 months (range 1 year-10 years and 8 months). There were 28 good (69%), 10 fair (24%), and 3 poor (7%) results. Patients with pending litigation or work-related injuries (5 good, 5 fair, and 3 poor) did less well overall than those without these issues (23 good, 5 fair, and 0 poor). Fusion is not routinely required in patients undergoing repeat laminectomy and discectomy for recurrent disc herniation. In the absence of objective evidence of spinal instability, recurrent disc herniation may be adequately treated by repeat lumbar laminectomy and discectomy alone.
46例曾因腰椎间盘突出症接受过椎板切除术和椎间盘切除术的患者,因复发性椎间盘突出症接受了再次椎板切除术和椎间盘切除术。46例患者共治疗了50次复发,距上次椎板切除术后平均7年1个月(范围3个月至22年11个月)。34例患者在同一节段治疗了37次复发,其中3例接受了第三次椎板切除术和椎间盘切除术。12例患者在不同节段治疗了13次复发。4例患者因复发性椎间盘突出症接受了第三次椎板切除术和椎间盘切除术。41例患者进行了至少1年的随访,平均随访时间为4年6个月(范围1年至10年8个月)。结果为优28例(69%),良10例(24%),差3例(7%)。有未决诉讼或工伤的患者(优5例,良5例,差3例)总体效果不如无这些问题的患者(优23例,良5例,差0例)。对于因复发性椎间盘突出症接受再次椎板切除术和椎间盘切除术的患者,通常不需要进行融合术。在没有脊柱不稳定客观证据的情况下,复发性椎间盘突出症单独通过再次腰椎椎板切除术和椎间盘切除术可能得到充分治疗。