Ryan P J, Blake G M, Herd R, Parker J, Fogelman I
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Osteoporos Int. 1994 Mar;4(2):67-71. doi: 10.1007/BF01623225.
The significance of variability in bone mineral density (BMD) between lumbar vertebrae L1 to L4 in the same individual was investigated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 1000 normal women aged 40-60 years (average 52 years) and 145 women aged 45-80 years (average 65 years) with vertebral osteoporosis. The mean BMD increased from L1 to L4 in normal women from 0.841 g/cm2 to 1.017 g/cm2, and in osteoporotics from 0.562 g/cm2 to 0.709 g/cm2. Z scores for osteoporotic women (Z = osteoporotic BMD - age-normal BMD/normal SD) were significantly lower for individual vertebrae compared with L1-4 and at L4 compared with L1, L2 and L3 (p < 0.001). The mean difference between Z scores for the highest and lowest vertebrae in an individual was 0.70 for normals (SD = 0.40) and 0.64 for osteoporotics (SD = 0.36). The mean Z score difference between the L1-4 Z score and the lowest individual vertebral Z score was 0.36 for normals (SD = 0.23) and 0.06 for osteoporotics (SD = 0.31). However, receiver operating analysis (ROC) curves showed that the lowest Z score for any individual vertebra did not provide improved discrimination between normals and osteoporotics when compared with the L1-4 Z score. The area under the ROC curve for L1-4 was significantly greater than for individual vertebrae (p < 0.05) and that for L4 was significantly smaller than for L1, L2 or L3 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, L1-4 BMD gives greater diagnostic sensitivity for osteoporosis than individual vertebrae, and L1, L2 and L3 are better than L4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
采用双能X线吸收法对1000名年龄在40至60岁(平均52岁)的正常女性以及145名年龄在45至80岁(平均65岁)的椎体骨质疏松女性进行研究,以探讨同一人第1至4腰椎骨密度(BMD)变异性的意义。正常女性的平均骨密度从L1至L4从0.841g/cm²增加到1.017g/cm²,骨质疏松女性则从0.562g/cm²增加到0.709g/cm²。与L1 - 4相比,骨质疏松女性单个椎体的Z评分(Z = 骨质疏松骨密度 - 年龄匹配正常骨密度/正常标准差)显著更低,且与L1、L2和L3相比,L4的Z评分也显著更低(p < 0.001)。个体中最高和最低椎体Z评分的平均差异,正常人为0.70(标准差 = 0.40),骨质疏松者为0.64(标准差 = 0.36)。L1 - 4的Z评分与最低个体椎体Z评分之间的平均Z评分差异,正常人为0.36(标准差 = 0.23),骨质疏松者为0.06(标准差 = 0.31)。然而,受试者操作分析(ROC)曲线显示,与L1 - 4的Z评分相比,任何单个椎体的最低Z评分在区分正常人和骨质疏松者方面并未提供更好的辨别能力。L1 - 4的ROC曲线下面积显著大于单个椎体(p < 0.05),且L4的曲线下面积显著小于L1、L2或L3(p < 0.001)。总之,L1 - 4的骨密度对骨质疏松的诊断敏感性高于单个椎体,且L1、L2和L3优于L4。(摘要截短至250字)