Suppr超能文献

对于骨矿物质密度低的骨骼,两枚3.5毫米逆行螺钉在前骨盆环固定方面是否优于一枚7.3毫米螺钉?

Are two retrograde 3.5 mm screws superior to one 7.3 mm screw for anterior pelvic ring fixation in bones with low bone mineral density?

作者信息

Acklin Y P, Zderic I, Grechenig S, Richards R G, Schmitz P, Gueorguiev B

机构信息

AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstr. 8, CH-7270 Davos, Switzerland

AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstr. 8, CH-7270 Davos, Switzerland.

出版信息

Bone Joint Res. 2017 Jan;6(1):8-13. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0261.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Osteosynthesis of anterior pubic ramus fractures using one large-diameter screw can be challenging in terms of both surgical procedure and fixation stability. Small-fragment screws have the advantage of following the pelvic cortex and being more flexible.The aim of the present study was to biomechanically compare retrograde intramedullary fixation of the superior pubic ramus using either one large- or two small-diameter screws.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 12 human cadaveric hemipelvises were analysed in a matched pair study design. Bone mineral density of the specimens was 68 mgHA/cm (standard deviation (sd) 52). The anterior pelvic ring fracture was fixed with either one 7.3 mm cannulated screw (Group 1) or two 3.5 mm pelvic cortex screws (Group 2). Progressively increasing cyclic axial loading was applied through the acetabulum. Relative movements in terms of interfragmentary displacement and gap angle at the fracture site were evaluated by means of optical movement tracking. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to identify significant differences between the groups RESULTS: Initial axial construct stiffness was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.463). Interfragmentary displacement and gap angle at the fracture site were also not statistically significantly different between the groups throughout the evaluated cycles (p ⩾ 0.249). Similarly, cycles to failure were not statistically different between Group 1 (8438, sd 6968) and Group 2 (10 213, sd 10 334), p = 0.379. Failure mode in both groups was characterised by screw cutting through the cancellous bone.

CONCLUSION

From a biomechanical point of view, pubic ramus stabilisation with either one large or two small fragment screw osteosynthesis is comparable in osteoporotic bone. However, the two-screw fixation technique is less demanding as the smaller screws deflect at the cortical margins.Cite this article: Y. P. Acklin, I. Zderic, S. Grechenig, R. G. Richards, P. Schmitz, B. Gueorguiev. Are two retrograde 3.5 mm screws superior to one 7.3 mm screw for anterior pelvic ring fixation in bones with low bone mineral density? Bone Joint Res 2017;6:8-13. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0261.

摘要

目的

使用一枚大直径螺钉对耻骨支骨折进行骨合成,在手术操作和固定稳定性方面都可能具有挑战性。小碎片螺钉具有贴合骨盆皮质且更灵活的优点。本研究的目的是对使用一枚大直径或两枚小直径螺钉逆行髓内固定耻骨上支进行生物力学比较。

材料与方法

在配对研究设计中对12例人类尸体半骨盆进行分析。标本的骨矿物质密度为68mgHA/cm(标准差(sd)52)。骨盆前环骨折用一枚7.3mm空心螺钉(第1组)或两枚3.5mm骨盆皮质螺钉(第2组)固定。通过髋臼施加逐渐增加的周期性轴向载荷。通过光学运动跟踪评估骨折部位的碎片间位移和间隙角度方面的相对运动。应用Wilcoxon符号秩检验来确定两组之间的显著差异。结果:两组之间的初始轴向结构刚度无显著差异(p = 0.463)。在整个评估周期内,两组在骨折部位的碎片间位移和间隙角度也无统计学显著差异(p⩾0.249)。同样,第1组(8438,sd 6968)和第2组(10213,sd 10334)之间的失效循环次数无统计学差异,p = 0.379。两组的失效模式均表现为螺钉切割松质骨。

结论

从生物力学角度来看,在骨质疏松性骨中,使用一枚大直径或两枚小碎片螺钉进行耻骨支稳定化骨合成具有可比性。然而,双螺钉固定技术要求较低,因为较小的螺钉在皮质边缘会发生偏转。引用本文:Y.P.阿克林,I.兹德里克,S.格雷切尼格,R.G.理查兹,P.施密茨,B.格奥尔基耶夫。对于低骨矿物质密度的骨骼,两枚逆行3.5mm螺钉在前骨盆环固定方面是否优于一枚7.3mm螺钉?《骨与关节研究》2017;6:8 - 13。DOI:10.1302/2046 - 3758.61.BJR - 2016 - 0261。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd38/5227056/3f49d1cebe04/bonejointres-06-008-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验